Skip to content

B Flows On, H Steps Down

Irodov 3.276DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.276

An infinitely long straight solenoid carries a current. One half of it, the region x>0x > 0 along its axis, is filled with a magnetic substance of permeability μ\mu; the other half, x<0x < 0, is empty, and xx is measured along the axis from the face of the filling at OO. Sketch how the magnetic induction BB, the field strength HH and the magnetization JJ vary along the axis as functions of xx.

The long solenoid in axial section, cut off at both drawn ends, carrying the current I. The magnetic substance (shaded, μ) fills it for x > 0, from the face at O; for x < 0 it is empty.

The long solenoid in axial section, cut off at both drawn ends, carrying the current II. The magnetic substance (shaded, μ\mu) fills it for x>0x > 0, from the face at OO; for x<0x < 0 it is empty.

Given
  • infinitely long solenoid
  • filled for x>0x > 0 with permeability μ\mu
  • empty for x<0x < 0
  • μ>1\mu > 1, a paramagnet or iron (assumed)
Find
plots of BB, HH and JJ on the axis against xx

Solution

Step 1Far from the face

Let the winding have nn turns per unit length carrying the current II, and radius aa. Far from OO on either side the solenoid looks infinitely long and uniformly filled (or empty). There the field is uniform and axial inside and zero outside, so the circulation of H\vect{H} round a rectangle with one long side inside, length ℓ\ell, and one outside equals the free current nIℓnI\ell it encloses. On both sides, and in both media,

H=nI(∣x∣≫a)H = nI \qquad (|x| \gg a)

With B=μμ0HB = \mu\mu_0H and J=(μ−1)HJ = (\mu - 1)H this gives the far values

x≪−a:B=μ0nI,H=nI,J=0x≫a:B=μμ0nI,H=nI,J=(μ−1) nI(1) \begin{aligned} x \ll -a:&\quad B = \mu_0 nI, \quad H = nI, \quad J = 0\\ x \gg a:&\quad B = \mu\mu_0 nI, \quad H = nI, \quad J = (\mu - 1)\,nI \end{aligned} \tag{1}
Step 2What the face does to each quantity

At OO the field is along the axis, normal to the face. The normal component of B\vect{B} is continuous across any surface, so BB has a single value B(0)B(0) at the face. HH and JJ then jump there, because the medium changes:

H(0−)=B(0)μ0,H(0+)=B(0)μμ0,J(0+)=(μ−1) H(0+)(2) H(0^-) = \frac{B(0)}{\mu_0}, \qquad H(0^+) = \frac{B(0)}{\mu\mu_0}, \qquad J(0^+) = (\mu - 1)\,H(0^+) \tag{2}

So HH drops by the factor μ\mu crossing the face, and JJ jumps from zero to J(0+)J(0^+).

Step 3Which way the curves bend

The field of the winding alone is μ0nI\mu_0nI everywhere on the axis. The filling adds the field of its molecular currents, which circle the filling’s surface in the same sense as the winding (for μ>1\mu > 1) and exist only for x>0x > 0. Each ring of them adds a positive axial field everywhere on the axis, more strongly the nearer it is, so, taking the magnetization not to decrease into the filling (which the estimate of Step 4 bears out), their total grows steadily from nothing far to the left to its full value (μ−1)μ0nI(\mu - 1)\mu_0nI far to the right. BB therefore rises monotonically, without a jump, from μ0nI\mu_0nI to μμ0nI\mu\mu_0nI, and its value at the face lies strictly between:

μ0nI<B(0)<μμ0nI\mu_0 nI < B(0) < \mu\mu_0 nI

By (2) this puts H(0−)H(0^-) above nInI and H(0+)H(0^+) below it. So HH rises above nInI as xx approaches the face from the left, drops at the face to below nInI, and climbs back to nInI deep inside the filling; JJ, following HH on the right, jumps up at the face to a value below (μ−1)nI(\mu - 1)nI and then rises to it.

Step 4An estimate for the plot

To draw the curves, keep only that pole: the face of the filling carries a uniform effective pole density −J(0+)-J(0^+) over a disc of radius aa (the poles spread through the filling where JJ still grows are neglected; in this estimate their total is (μ−1)/2(\mu - 1)/2 times the face’s, equal to it at μ=3\mu = 3 and larger beyond, so the estimate fixes the shapes, not the exact values). On the axis such a disc adds to HH a field of half the pole density times 1−∣x∣/(x2+a2)1/21 - |x|/(x^2 + a^2)^{1/2}, pointing toward the face, so with Jf=J(0+)J_f = J(0^+)

H(x)=nI+Jf2(1−∣x∣x2+a2)(x<0)H(x)=nI−Jf2(1−xx2+a2)(x>0)(3) \begin{aligned} H(x) &= nI + \frac{J_f}{2}\left(1 - \frac{|x|}{\sqrt{x^2 + a^2}}\right) \qquad (x < 0)\\[2pt] H(x) &= nI - \frac{J_f}{2}\left(1 - \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + a^2}}\right) \qquad (x > 0) \end{aligned} \tag{3}

The face value must be consistent with the material’s response, Jf=(μ−1)H(0+)J_f = (\mu - 1)H(0^+). Setting x=0+x = 0^+ in (3),

Jf=(μ−1)(nI−Jf2)J_f = (\mu - 1)\left(nI - \frac{J_f}{2}\right)

and solving for JfJ_f,

Jf=2 (μ−1)μ+1 nIJ_f = \frac{2\,(\mu - 1)}{\mu + 1}\,nI

The two one-sided values of (3) at the face are then H(0−)=nI+Jf/2H(0^-) = nI + J_f/2 and H(0+)=nI−Jf/2H(0^+) = nI - J_f/2, that is

H(0−)=2μμ+1 nI,H(0+)=2μ+1 nIH(0^-) = \frac{2\mu}{\mu + 1}\,nI, \qquad H(0^+) = \frac{2}{\mu + 1}\,nI

and the induction at the face, μ0H(0−)\mu_0H(0^-), is in this estimate

B(0)=2μμ+1 μ0nIB(0) = \frac{2\mu}{\mu + 1}\,\mu_0 nI
(4)

and the three curves, drawn from (3) for μ=3\mu = 3, are these:

B, H and J on the axis against x, from the face-pole estimate with μ = 3 and x in units of the solenoid's radius a. B is continuous at the face; H steps down there and J steps up from zero.

BB, HH and JJ on the axis against xx, from the face-pole estimate with μ=3\mu = 3 and xx in units of the solenoid’s radius aa. BB is continuous at the face; HH steps down there and JJ steps up from zero.

BB is continuous at x=0x = 0 (with a kink); HH and JJ jump there
Check

The estimate keeps BB continuous at the face, as it must, because the pole sheet makes HH jump by exactly JfJ_f: μμ0H(0+)\mu\mu_0H(0^+) from the inside is also 2μμ0nI/(μ+1)2\mu\mu_0nI/(\mu + 1), the value (4) found from outside. That value lies between μ0nI\mu_0nI and μμ0nI\mu\mu_0nI for every μ>1\mu > 1, as Step 3 requires. The slope of BB on the axis does step up by the factor μ\mu at the face, the kink in the plot: zero divergence ties it to the radial part of B\vect{B}, which is tangential to the face and so μ\mu times larger inside, where HtH_t is continuous. With μ=1\mu = 1 it gives Jf=0J_f = 0 and B=μ0nIB = \mu_0nI, H=nIH = nI everywhere: no filling, no structure. Far from the face, (3) returns H=nIH = nI on both sides, the values of (1).

Remark

For large μ\mu the estimate’s B(0)≈2μ0nIB(0) \approx 2\mu_0nI is far below the μμ0nI\mu\mu_0nI deep inside, so most of the rise of BB happens beyond the face, where the poles the estimate neglects carry it; the numbers are then rough, while the shapes stay those of the sketch. The pole on the face is also why a short iron rod in a coil is magnetized much less than a long one: its two faces carry poles whose field opposes the coil’s inside the rod, the demagnetizing field.