Skip to content

Two Rods, One Clock, One Gap

Irodov 1.350DifficultyDifficulty 4 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.350

Two rods, identical when at rest and each of proper length l0l_0, move toward each other parallel to a common straight axis, passing each other. Work in the rest frame of one of the rods. At one instant the right-hand ends of the two rods coincide; a time Δt\Delta t later, as measured in that frame, the left-hand ends of the two rods coincide. Find the velocity vv of one rod relative to the other.

Given
  • proper length l0l_0 for each rod
  • time interval Δt\Delta t between the two coincidences, measured in the rest frame of rod 1
Find
Find vv, the velocity of one rod relative to the other

Solution

Step 1Sit on one rod, where only the other one is short

Everything is measured in the rest frame of rod 1, so in that frame rod 1 keeps its proper length while rod 2 sweeps past at the relative speed vv and is contracted. Writing β=v/c\beta = v/c, the two drawn lengths are

l1=l0,l2=l=l01−β2.l_1 = l_0, \qquad l_2 = l = l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^2} .
First coincidence: the right ends line up, the clock on rod 1 reads t_1. Rod 2 is drawn contracted to l = l_0sqrt(1-β^2).

First coincidence: the right ends line up, the clock on rod 1 reads t1t_1. Rod 2 is drawn contracted to l=l01−β2l = l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^2}.

Second coincidence, a time Δ t = t_2-t_1 later in that frame: rod 2 has slid a distance l_0 - l to the left and the left ends now line up.

Second coincidence, a time Δt=t2−t1\Delta t = t_2-t_1 later in that frame: rod 2 has slid a distance l0−ll_0 - l to the left and the left ends now line up.

Step 2Turn the two coincidences into one distance

Put the moving rod’s right end level with the stationary rod’s right end: that is the first event. Rod 2 then keeps sliding, and its left end reaches the stationary rod’s left end when rod 2 has advanced by exactly the difference of the two lengths. The gap it must close is therefore

Δx=l1−l2=l0−l01−β2.\Delta x = l_1 - l_2 = l_0 - l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^2} .

Rod 2 covers this at the constant speed vv in the stated time, so

v Δt=l0(1−1−β2)v\,\Delta t = l_0\left(1-\sqrt{1-\beta^2}\right)
(1)
Step 3Solve for the speed hidden on both sides

Equation (1) carries vv both openly and inside the radical, so isolate the radical first:

1−v2c2=1−v Δtl0.\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} = 1 - \frac{v\,\Delta t}{l_0} .

Squaring removes the root, and the 11 on each side cancels:

1−v2c2=1−2v Δtl0+v2 Δt2l02v2c2+v2 Δt2l02=2v Δtl0.\begin{aligned} 1-\frac{v^2}{c^2} &= 1 - \frac{2v\,\Delta t}{l_0} + \frac{v^2\,\Delta t^2}{l_0^2} \\[2pt] \frac{v^2}{c^2} + \frac{v^2\,\Delta t^2}{l_0^2} &= \frac{2v\,\Delta t}{l_0} . \end{aligned}

Every term carries one factor of vv at least, and v≠0v \ne 0, so divide through by vv and collect it:

v(1c2+Δt2l02)=2 Δtl0.(2) v\left(\frac{1}{c^2} + \frac{\Delta t^2}{l_0^2}\right) = \frac{2\,\Delta t}{l_0} . \tag{2}
Step 4Read off the relative velocity

Divide (2) by the coefficient of vv:

v=2 Δt/l01c2+Δt2l02.v = \frac{2\,\Delta t/l_0}{\dfrac{1}{c^2}+\dfrac{\Delta t^2}{l_0^2}} .

Multiplying numerator and denominator by l02/Δt2l_0^2/\Delta t^2 clears the small quantities out of the denominator and gives the relative velocity:

v=2l0/Δt1+(l0c Δt)2v = \frac{2l_0/\Delta t}{1+\left(\dfrac{l_0}{c\,\Delta t}\right)^2}
(3)
Check

Write k=l0/(c Δt)k = l_0/(c\,\Delta t), so that the answer reads v/c=2k/(1+k2)v/c = 2k/(1+k^2). Since (k−1)2≥0(k-1)^2 \ge 0 gives 1+k2≥2k1+k^2 \ge 2k, this is at most 11 for every positive kk, with equality only at k=1k = 1: the formula can never return a superluminal relative velocity, whatever Δt\Delta t is fed to it. A worked case confirms the algebra: at v=0.6cv = 0.6c the contraction factor is 0.80.8, so (1) gives Δt=0.2 l0/(0.6c)=l0/(3c)\Delta t = 0.2\,l_0/(0.6c) = l_0/(3c), hence k=3k = 3 and 2k/(1+k2)=6/10=0.62k/(1+k^2) = 6/10 = 0.6, returning the speed it started from.

Remark

The non-relativistic limit is the interesting one, because there is nothing left of the effect: as β→0\beta \to 0 the right-hand side of (1) vanishes like β2\beta^2, so Δt→0\Delta t \to 0 and the two coincidences become simultaneous. In Galilean physics both rods are l0l_0 long in every frame and the ends meet in pairs at one instant, so the whole of Δt\Delta t is contraction and nothing else.