Skip to content

Two Simultaneities, Two Lengths, One Rod

Irodov 1.349DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.349

A straight rod slides along a stationary ruler at a constant velocity vv directed along its own length, and every mark is read off that one ruler. In the first procedure the positions of the rod’s two ends are marked at one and the same instant of the ruler’s frame, and the two marks differ by Δx1=4.0\Delta x_1 = 4.0 m on the ruler. In the second procedure the positions of the same two ends are marked at one and the same instant of the rod’s frame, and those two marks differ by Δx2=9.0\Delta x_2 = 9.0 m on the same ruler. Writing β=v/c\beta = v/c, find the proper length l0l_0 of the rod and its velocity vv relative to the ruler.

Both markings in the ruler frame, the royal lines being the rod's ends. O and P are marked at one ruler instant, Δ x_1 apart; O and Q at one rod instant, on the tilted x' axis, Q dropped to x to give Δ x_2.

Both markings in the ruler frame, the royal lines being the rod’s ends. OO and PP are marked at one ruler instant, Δx1\Delta x_1 apart; OO and QQ at one rod instant, on the tilted x′x' axis, QQ dropped to xx to give Δx2\Delta x_2.

Given
  • Δx1=4.0\Delta x_1 = 4.0 m
  • Δx2=9.0\Delta x_2 = 9.0 m
  • β=v/c\beta = v/c
  • c=3.00×108c = 3.00\times 10^{8} m/s
Find
the proper length l0l_0 of the rod and its velocity vv relative to the ruler

Solution

Step 1The ruler-simultaneous marking returns the contracted length

The first pair of marking events is simultaneous in the ruler frame KK, so Δt=0\Delta t = 0 and their separation there is the reading difference Δx1\Delta x_1. In the rod frame K′K' those same two events sit at the rod’s two ends, a proper length l0l_0 apart. The Lorentz transformation from KK to K′K' ties the two together.

Δx′=Δx−v Δt1−β2,l0=Δx1−v⋅01−β2\begin{align*}\Delta x' &= \frac{\Delta x - v\,\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}, \\ l_0 &= \frac{\Delta x_1 - v\cdot 0}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}\end{align*}
Δx1=l01−β2\Delta x_1 = l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}
(1)
Step 2The rod-simultaneous marking returns a longer stretch of ruler
The second procedure from the rod: the rod at rest at its proper length l_0, the ruler streaming left, the marked stretch drawn contracted. It reads Δ x_2 on the ruler's graduations yet covers exactly the rod: the two brackets come out equal.

The second procedure from the rod: the rod at rest at its proper length l0l_0, the ruler streaming left, the marked stretch drawn contracted. It reads Δx2\Delta x_2 on the ruler’s graduations yet covers exactly the rod: the two brackets come out equal.

The second pair of marking events is simultaneous in the rod frame K′K' and separated there by the rod’s own proper length, so Δt′=0\Delta t' = 0 and Δx′=l0\Delta x' = l_0. Their ruler readings are their xx coordinates in the ruler frame KK, so the Lorentz transformation from K′K' to KK delivers the answer directly.

Δx2=Δx′+v Δt′1−β2=l0+v⋅01−β2\begin{align*}\Delta x_2 &= \frac{\Delta x' + v\,\Delta t'}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}} \\ &= \frac{l_0 + v\cdot 0}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}\end{align*}
Δx2=l01−β2\Delta x_2 = \dfrac{l_0}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}
(2)
Step 3The product and the quotient separate the two unknowns

Equations (1) and (2) carry the two unknowns l0l_0 and β\beta in a form that a product and a quotient untangle at once, the product killing the radical and the quotient killing l0l_0.

Δx1 Δx2=l01−β2⋅l01−β2=l02,Δx1Δx2=l01−β2l0/1−β2=1−β2(3) \begin{aligned} \Delta x_1\,\Delta x_2 &= l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}\cdot \frac{l_0}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}} = l_0^{2}, \\ \frac{\Delta x_1}{\Delta x_2} &= \frac{l_0\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}} {l_0/\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}} = 1-\beta^{2} \end{aligned} \tag{3}

Taking the root of the first and putting in the data,

l0=(4.0 m)(9.0 m)l_0 = \sqrt{(4.0\ \mathrm{m})(9.0\ \mathrm{m})}
l0=Δx1 Δx2=6.0 ml_0 = \sqrt{\Delta x_1\,\Delta x_2} = 6.0\ \mathrm{m}
(4)
Step 4The velocity from the ratio of the two readings

The second line of (3) already isolates β2\beta^{2}, so only a square root and a multiplication by cc are left. Evaluating the ratio first,

β2=1−Δx1Δx2=1−4.0 m9.0 m=0.5556,β=0.7454\begin{align*}\beta^{2} &= 1-\frac{\Delta x_1}{\Delta x_2} = 1-\frac{4.0\ \mathrm{m}}{9.0\ \mathrm{m}} = 0.5556, \\ \beta &= 0.7454\end{align*}

Restoring the factor of cc that turns the dimensionless β\beta into a speed,

v=(0.7454)(3.00×108 m/s)v = (0.7454)(3.00\times 10^{8}\ \mathrm{m/s})
v=c1−Δx1/Δx2=2.2×108 m/sv = c\sqrt{1-\Delta x_1/\Delta x_2} = 2.2\times 10^{8}\ \mathrm{m/s}
(5)
Check

Put the two answers back into the two measurements. With l0=6.0l_0 = 6.0 m and 1−β2=0.6667\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}} = 0.6667, (1) gives Δx1=(6.0)(0.6667)=4.0\Delta x_1 = (6.0)(0.6667) = 4.0 m and (2) gives Δx2=6.0/0.6667=9.0\Delta x_2 = 6.0/0.6667 = 9.0 m, both as stated. The units also check: each answer is built from lengths alone, so l0l_0 is a length and β\beta is a pure number.

Remark

The proper length is the geometric mean of the two ruler readings, and it must lie between them: the ruler-simultaneous reading is short of l0l_0 by the factor 1−β2\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}} and the rod-simultaneous reading is long by the same factor. Only the first of the two numbers is a length of the rod in any frame at all. The second is a stretch of the ruler, and it exceeds l0l_0 for the reason the second figure shows: in the rod’s frame it is the ruler’s graduations that are contracted, so it takes Δx2=9.0\Delta x_2 = 9.0 m of ruler markings to span the 6.06.0 m the rod occupies there.