Skip to content

Self-Weight Bends a Girder Two Ways

Irodov 1.303DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.303

A rectangular steel girder has thickness (cross-sectional height) hh, and its own weight is now the only load on it, distributed uniformly along its length. Using the same governing relation as Problem 1.301, N(x)=EI d2y/dx2N(x)=EI\,d^2y/dx^2, find the deflection λ\lambda this self-weight produces in two separate cases:

  1. the girder is built into a wall at one end, with a protruding section of length ll, and λ\lambda is the drop of the free end below its original, undeflected position

  2. the girder, of total length 2l2l, rests freely on two end supports, a pin at one and a roller at the other, and λ\lambda is the sag at the midpoint

Case (a): the cantilever, built in at the wall, sagging under its own distributed weight q per unit length. The dashed curve is the deflected shape, drawn exaggerated, and not the undeflected reference direction; λ is the drop of its free end.

Case (a): the cantilever, built in at the wall, sagging under its own distributed weight qq per unit length. The dashed curve is the deflected shape, drawn exaggerated, and not the undeflected reference direction; λ\lambda is the drop of its free end.

Case (b): the same girder doubled to length 2l and simply supported at both ends, sagging under the same distributed self-weight. Again the dashed curve is the exaggerated deflected shape; λ is its sag at the midpoint.

Case (b): the same girder doubled to length 2l2l and simply supported at both ends, sagging under the same distributed self-weight. Again the dashed curve is the exaggerated deflected shape; λ\lambda is its sag at the midpoint.

Given
  • rectangular cross-section, thickness hh
  • steel: ρ\rho, EE known
  • self-weight only, no other load
Find
(a) λ\lambda for a cantilever of length ll, (b) λ\lambda for a simply supported girder of length 2l2l

Solution

Step 1The cross-section and the distributed self-weight

For a rectangular cross-section of width bb and thickness hh, bending about the horizontal centroidal axis, the moment of inertia and the self-weight per unit length are, exactly as in Problem 1.300,

I=bh312,q=ρ(bh)g,(1) I = \frac{bh^3}{12}, \qquad q = \rho(bh)g, \tag{1}

where ρ\rho is the density of steel. Both cases below reuse these.

Step 2Part (a): the cantilever’s governing equation

Cut the protruding section at distance xx from the wall, 0≤x≤l0\le x\le l. The moment there is carried by the overhanging weight beyond the cut, exactly as found in Problem 1.300, and the girder is built in at x=0x=0, so both the deflection and the slope vanish there.

EI y′′=N(x)=q2(l−x)2,y(0)=0,  y′(0)=0.(2) EI\,y'' = N(x) = \frac{q}{2}(l-x)^2, \qquad y(0)=0,\ \ y'(0)=0. \tag{2}
Step 3Part (a): integrating to the tip

Integrating twice and fixing the constants from the wall conditions:

EI y′=−q6(l−x)3+C1,y′(0)=0  ⟹  C1=ql36EI y=ql36x+q24(l−x)4+C2,y(0)=0  ⟹  C2=−ql424\begin{aligned} EI\,y' &= -\frac{q}{6}(l-x)^3+C_1, & y'(0)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; C_1=\frac{ql^3}{6}\\[4pt] EI\,y &= \frac{ql^3}{6}x+\frac{q}{24}(l-x)^4+C_2, & y(0)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; C_2=-\frac{ql^4}{24} \end{aligned}

The tip deflection is y(l)y(l), where the (l−x)4(l-x)^4 term vanishes.

EI y(l)=ql36⋅l−ql424=ql46−ql424=ql48.EI\,y(l) = \frac{ql^3}{6}\cdot l-\frac{ql^4}{24} = \frac{ql^4}{6}-\frac{ql^4}{24} = \frac{ql^4}{8}.
λa=ql48EI\lambda_a = \frac{ql^4}{8EI}
(3)
Step 4Part (b): the simply supported girder’s governing equation

The girder now has total length 2l2l, and by symmetry each support carries half the total weight RR. Measure xx from the left support, 0≤x≤l0\le x\le l (the near half, by symmetry). The segment nearer that support carries the upward reaction RR and the downward weight qxqx of the piece itself, with the sign convention of Problem 1.302.

R=q(2l)2=ql,R = \frac{q(2l)}{2} = ql,

Taking moments about the cut, that reaction and the segment’s own weight give the bending moment there, and the support and the symmetry supply the two conditions the integration will need.

EI y′′=N(x)=−R x+(qx)⋅x2=q2x2−qlx,y(0)=0,  y′(l)=0 (symmetry).EI\,y'' = N(x) = -R\,x+(qx)\cdot\frac{x}{2} = \frac{q}{2}x^2-qlx, \qquad y(0)=0,\ \ y'(l)=0\ (\text{symmetry}).
Step 5Part (b): integrating to the midpoint
EI y′=q6x3−ql2x2+C1,y′(l)=0  ⟹  C1=ql33EI y=q24x4−ql6x3+ql33x+C2,y(0)=0  ⟹  C2=0\begin{aligned} EI\,y' &= \frac{q}{6}x^3-\frac{ql}{2}x^2+C_1, & y'(l)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; C_1=\frac{ql^3}{3}\\[4pt] EI\,y &= \frac{q}{24}x^4-\frac{ql}{6}x^3+\frac{ql^3}{3}x+C_2, & y(0)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; C_2=0 \end{aligned}

The midpoint deflection is y(l)y(l).

EI y(l)=q24l4−ql6l3+ql33l=ql4(124−16+13)=524ql4.EI\,y(l) = \frac{q}{24}l^4-\frac{ql}{6}l^3+\frac{ql^3}{3}l = ql^4\left(\frac{1}{24}-\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{3}\right) = \frac{5}{24}ql^4.
λb=5ql424EI\lambda_b = \frac{5ql^4}{24EI}
(4)
Step 6Eliminating the unknown cross-section

Both boxed results still carry the width bb hidden inside qq and II. Dividing qq by II from (1) removes it.

qI=ρ(bh)gbh3/12=12ρgh2.(5) \frac{q}{I} = \frac{\rho(bh)g}{bh^3/12} = \frac{12\rho g}{h^2}. \tag{5}

Substituting this into (3) and (4) gives both deflections purely in terms of ρ\rho, gg, ll, EE and hh.

λa=l48E⋅12ρgh2,λb=5l424E⋅12ρgh2.\lambda_a = \frac{l^4}{8E}\cdot\frac{12\rho g}{h^2}, \qquad \lambda_b = \frac{5l^4}{24E}\cdot\frac{12\rho g}{h^2}.

For (a), the cantilever of length ll,

λa=32ρgl4Eh2\lambda_a = \frac{3}{2}\frac{\rho g l^4}{Eh^2}
(6)

For (b), the simply supported girder of length 2l2l,

λb=52ρgl4Eh2\lambda_b = \frac{5}{2}\frac{\rho g l^4}{Eh^2}
(7)
Check

The cantilever’s governing equation (2) at x=0x=0 gives the curvature at the wall, N(0)/(EI)=ql2/(2EI)N(0)/(EI)=ql^2/(2EI), which after the substitution (5) is 6ρgl2/(Eh2)6\rho g l^2/(Eh^2), exactly Problem 1.300’s boxed curvature for the same cantilever. And ρgl4/(Eh2)\rho g l^4/(Eh^2) carries units of (kg/m3^3)(m/s2^2)(m4^4)/(Pa⋅\cdotm2^2), which reduces to a meter, correct for both boxed deflections.

Remark

The two boxed results are not directly comparable term for term, because the problem deliberately compares a cantilever of length ll against a simply supported girder of twice that length, 2l2l. Written instead at equal total span LL, a self-loaded cantilever of length LL sags qL4/(8EI)qL^4/(8EI) at its tip while a simply supported girder of the same length LL sags only 5qL4/(384EI)5qL^4/(384EI) at its center, a factor of 48/5≈9.648/5\approx9.6 stiffer for the same span and the same weight per unit length: a second support removes far more sag than the doubled span and doubled weight of case (b) give back, which is exactly why case (b) still comes out only 5/35/3 times case (a) despite carrying twice the length and twice the total weight.