Problem Irodov 1.299
A bar of an isotropic elastic material, with Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio , is immersed in a fluid at pressure , so every face of the bar is pushed inward by the same pressure . Find:
the fractional decrease in the bar’s volume,
the compressibility (the fractional volume decrease per unit pressure) expressed through and , and, from that relation, an upper bound on
A small element of the bar, pressed inward by the same pressure on every face: the stress state is the same compression along all three principal directions at once.
- Given
- , known
- hydrostatic pressure on every face
- Find
- (a) , (b) , and the bound on
Solution
Step 1The strain along each principal direction
Every face carries the same compressive stress , so the stress state is . The generalized Hooke’s law gives the strain along one axis from the stress on that axis together with the stresses on the other two.
and by the symmetry of the loading, .
Step 2Part (a): the fractional volume change
To first order the fractional volume change is the sum of the three principal strains, which are all equal here.
Step 3Part (b): the compressibility
The compressibility is defined as the fractional volume decrease per unit pressure. Substituting (1) into this definition gives directly in terms of the elastic constants.
Step 4Part (b), continued: the bound on Poisson’s ratio
A real solid contracts, never expands, under an all-around squeeze, so the compressibility above must be positive. Since for any elastic material, this requirement bounds .
Check
At (no lateral coupling at all), , the sum of three independent uniaxial compliances acting together, as it should. As , both and fall to zero, the incompressible limit, consistent with the same factor vanishing there in Problems 1.297 and 1.298.
Remark
For the same stress magnitude, hydrostatic pressure changes a solid’s volume exactly three times as fast as a single uniaxial stress does: Problems 1.297 and 1.298 each found a uniaxial volume response of , and here all three principal directions carry that same stress at once, so the three identical contributions simply add. The bound is really a statement that the bulk modulus , the stiffness against exactly this all-around squeeze, must stay finite and positive.
