Problem Irodov 1.292
A copper rod of length m spins in a horizontal plane about a vertical axis passing through its own midpoint. The rod ruptures when the stress in it, the internal tension per unit cross-sectional area, reaches copper’s tensile strength. Find the number of complete revolutions per second at which this happens.
The rod of length , seen from above, spinning about the vertical axis through its center .
- Given
- m
- copper
- Find
- , the number of revolutions per second at which the rod snaps
Solution
Step 1The tension a cross-section must carry
The same rod with a slice at distance from . The slice needs a centripetal pull, supplied by the tension in the rod on either side of it.
Cut the rod at distance from the axis and look at the piece running from out to the free end of that half, at . Every slice of that outer piece has mass , where is the rod’s cross-sectional area and its density, and needs a centripetal force directed back toward . The cross-section at carries the sum of every such pull further out.
Step 2Where the stress is greatest
The tensile stress at is , which no longer depends on :
This is largest at the center, , where the pull of both halves passes through a single cross-section:
Step 3The rupture condition
The rod fails once reaches copper’s tensile strength . Setting in (1) taken at and solving for isolates the critical angular velocity.
What the problem asks for is the rate in complete revolutions per second, and one revolution is radians, so the two rates are related by .
Step 4Numbers
Copper: kg/m, Pa. With m, evaluate , take its square root, and divide by to get in revolutions per second.
Check
has units Pa/(kg/m) = m/s, so carries units of s, correct for . Doubling halves : a longer rod develops more stress at the same spin rate, so it snaps sooner.
Remark
Neither nor depends on the rod’s cross-sectional area: it canceled out of on the way to (1) because both the centripetal demand and the area carrying it scale together. A thicker copper rod of the same length is therefore no more resistant to this kind of rupture than a thin one; the only levers that matter are the material’s specific strength and the length , which is why the answer never needed the rod’s diameter at all.
