Skip to content

One Field Becomes Two, at Right Angles

Irodov 3.363DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.363

Using the relativistic transformation formulas for the electric and magnetic fields, show that if an inertial frame KK contains only an electric field or only a magnetic field, then in any other inertial frame K′K' there are both an electric and a magnetic field at the same time, with E′⊥B′\vect E' \perp \vect B'.

Given
  • in KK: only E\vect E, or only B\vect B
  • K′K' moves relative to KK with velocity v\vect v
Find
show that E′\vect E' and B′\vect B' both exist and E′⊥B′\vect E' \perp \vect B'

Solution

Step 1The transformation formulas

Split each field into its part along v\vect v (subscript ∥\parallel) and its part across it (⊥\perp), and let β=v/c\beta = v/c. The fields in K′K' are

E∥′=E∥,E⊥′=E⊥+v×B1−β2,B∥′=B∥,B⊥′=B⊥−v×E/c21−β2(1) \begin{aligned} \vect E'_\parallel &= \vect E_\parallel, &\qquad \vect E'_\perp &= \frac{\vect E_\perp + \vect v\times\vect B}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}},\\ \vect B'_\parallel &= \vect B_\parallel, &\qquad \vect B'_\perp &= \frac{\vect B_\perp - \vect v\times\vect E/c^2}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} \end{aligned} \tag{1}

Only the perpendicular part of a field enters a cross product with v\vect v: v×E=v×E⊥\vect v\times\vect E = \vect v\times\vect E_\perp, and the same for B\vect B. Write γ=1/1−β2\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}.

Step 2Only an electric field in KK

With B=0\vect B = 0, (1) gives

E′=E∥+γ E⊥,B′=−γc2 v×E⊥\vect E' = \vect E_\parallel + \gamma\,\vect E_\perp, \qquad \vect B' = -\frac{\gamma}{c^2}\,\vect v\times\vect E_\perp
Only E in K, at an angle to v. In K' its perpendicular part grows by γ, giving E' in the page, while B' appears normal to the page.

Only E\vect E in KK, at an angle to v\vect v. In K′K' its perpendicular part grows by γ\gamma, giving E′\vect E' in the page, while B′\vect B' appears normal to the page.

The vector v×E⊥\vect v\times\vect E_\perp is perpendicular to v\vect v, hence to E∥\vect E_\parallel, and perpendicular to E⊥\vect E_\perp, so both terms of E′\vect E' are orthogonal to B′\vect B':

E′⋅B′=−γc2(E∥+γ E⊥)⋅(v×E⊥)=0\vect E'\cdot\vect B' = -\frac{\gamma}{c^2}\left(\vect E_\parallel + \gamma\,\vect E_\perp\right)\cdot\left(\vect v\times\vect E_\perp\right) = 0

And B′≠0\vect B' \neq 0 whenever E⊥≠0\vect E_\perp \neq 0: both fields are present in K′K'.

Step 3Only a magnetic field in KK

With E=0\vect E = 0 the roles swap:

E′=γ v×B⊥,B′=B∥+γ B⊥\vect E' = \gamma\,\vect v\times\vect B_\perp, \qquad \vect B' = \vect B_\parallel + \gamma\,\vect B_\perp
Only B in K: in K' the field B' lies in the page and E' appears normal to it.

Only B\vect B in KK: in K′K' the field B′\vect B' lies in the page and E′\vect E' appears normal to it.

By the same argument v×B⊥\vect v\times\vect B_\perp is perpendicular to both B∥\vect B_\parallel and B⊥\vect B_\perp:

E′⋅B′=γ(v×B⊥)⋅(B∥+γ B⊥)=0\vect E'\cdot\vect B' = \gamma\left(\vect v\times\vect B_\perp\right)\cdot\left(\vect B_\parallel + \gamma\,\vect B_\perp\right) = 0

So in both cases

E′⋅B′=0\vect E'\cdot\vect B' = 0
(2)

So E′⊥B′\vect E' \perp \vect B', and both fields exist in K′K' provided the field in KK has a part across v\vect v.

Check

The product E⋅B\vect E\cdot\vect B is a Lorentz invariant, and in KK it is zero because one of the two fields vanishes; so E′⋅B′\vect E'\cdot\vect B' must vanish in every frame, as found. The one exception to coexistence: if v\vect v is parallel to the field in KK, its perpendicular part is zero, and K′K' again sees a single field equal to the original one.

Remark

The other invariant, E2−c2B2E^2 - c^2B^2, sorts such fields for good: positive for a pure electric field in KK, negative for a pure magnetic one. In K′K' both fields are present, but the sign of E′2−c2B′2E'^2 - c^2B'^2 still records which one was alone in KK; a field with E⊥B\vect E\perp\vect B and E<cBE < cB can always be transformed into a pure magnetic field, and one with E>cBE > cB into a pure electric field.