Skip to content

The Gap Stores Three Quarters

Irodov 3.338DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.338

A thin ring of magnetic material has a mean diameter d=30d = 30 cm and a cross-sectional area S=5.0S = 5.0 cm2^2, and carries a winding of N=800N = 800 turns. The ring is cut across, leaving a gap of width b=2.0b = 2.0 mm. At the current flowing in the winding, the permeability of the material is μ=1400\mu = 1400. Neglecting the spreading of the flux at the edges of the gap, find:

  1. the ratio of the magnetic energy in the gap to that in the material;

  2. the inductance of the system, in two ways: from the flux, and from the energy of the field.

The cut ring (permeability μ, cross-section S) seen from above, with its winding of N turns carrying I, the gap b (widened for clarity) and the mean diameter d. The closed lines are B.

The cut ring (permeability μ\mu, cross-section SS) seen from above, with its winding of NN turns carrying II, the gap bb (widened for clarity) and the mean diameter dd. The closed lines are B\vect B.

Given
  • d=30d = 30 cm
  • N=800N = 800
  • S=5.0S = 5.0 cm2^2
  • b=2.0b = 2.0 mm
  • μ=1400\mu = 1400
  • no spreading at the gap edges
Find
(a) Wgap/WmW_{\mathrm{gap}}/W_{\mathrm{m}} · (b) LL, from the flux and from the energy

Solution

Step 1The same B in the material and in the gap

With no spreading at the edges, the flux tube keeps the ring’s cross-section SS across the gap. The normal component of B\vect B is continuous at each face of the cut, and here it is the whole field, so the induction BB is the same in the material and in the gap. The thin ring lets us take it uniform over SS. The mean circle runs πd−b\pi d - b through the material and bb across the gap, so the two volumes are

Vm=S(πd−b),Vgap=Sb(1) V_{\mathrm{m}} = S(\pi d - b), \qquad V_{\mathrm{gap}} = Sb \tag{1}
Step 2(a) The ratio of the energies

The energy density BH/2BH/2 is B2/2μμ0B^2/2\mu\mu_0 in the material and B2/2μ0B^2/2\mu_0 in the gap. Multiplying each by its volume from (1) and dividing, B2B^2, μ0\mu_0 and SS cancel:

WgapWm=(B2/2μ0) Sb(B2/2μμ0) S(πd−b)\frac{W_{\mathrm{gap}}}{W_{\mathrm{m}}} = \frac{(B^2/2\mu_0)\,Sb}{(B^2/2\mu\mu_0)\,S(\pi d - b)}

Numerically, with πd=0.942\pi d = 0.942 m,

μbπd−b=(1400)(2.0×10−3)0.942−0.002\frac{\mu b}{\pi d - b} = \frac{(1400)(2.0\times10^{-3})}{0.942 - 0.002}
WgapWm=μbπd−b≈3.0\frac{W_{\mathrm{gap}}}{W_{\mathrm{m}}} = \frac{\mu b}{\pi d - b} \approx 3.0
(2)

Since bb is 0.20.2 percent of πd\pi d, this is μb/πd\mu b/\pi d to that accuracy.

Step 3(b) The inductance from the flux

The circulation of H\vect H along the mean circle links the winding NN times. In the material H=B/μμ0H = B/\mu\mu_0, in the gap H0=B/μ0H_0 = B/\mu_0:

Bμμ0(πd−b)+Bμ0 b=NI\frac{B}{\mu\mu_0}(\pi d - b) + \frac{B}{\mu_0}\,b = NI

Solving for BB:

B=μ0NIb+(πd−b)/μ(3) B = \frac{\mu_0 NI}{b + (\pi d - b)/\mu} \tag{3}

Each of the NN turns is threaded by the flux BSBS, so the inductance is the linkage NBSNBS per unit current. With (3) the current cancels:

L=NBSI=NSI μ0NIb+(πd−b)/μL = \frac{NBS}{I} = \frac{N S}{I}\,\frac{\mu_0 NI}{b + (\pi d - b)/\mu}

Numerically, the numerator and the denominator are

μ0N2S=(4π×10−7)(800)2(5.0×10−4)=4.02×10−4 H mb+πd−bμ=2.0×10−3+0.9401400=2.67×10−3 m\begin{aligned} \mu_0 N^2 S &= (4\pi\times10^{-7})(800)^2(5.0\times10^{-4}) = 4.02\times10^{-4}\text{ H m}\\ b + \frac{\pi d - b}{\mu} &= 2.0\times10^{-3} + \frac{0.940}{1400} = 2.67\times10^{-3}\text{ m} \end{aligned}
L=μ0N2Sb+(πd−b)/μ≈0.15 HL = \frac{\mu_0 N^2 S}{b + (\pi d - b)/\mu} \approx 0.15\text{ H}
(4)

Dropping bb beside πd\pi d gives the same 0.150.15 H, with the denominator b+πd/μb + \pi d/\mu.

Step 4(b) The inductance from the energy

Now add the energies of the two parts, using the volumes (1):

W=B22μμ0 S(πd−b)+B22μ0 Sb=B2S2μ0[b+πd−bμ]W = \frac{B^2}{2\mu\mu_0}\,S(\pi d - b) + \frac{B^2}{2\mu_0}\,Sb = \frac{B^2 S}{2\mu_0}\left[b + \frac{\pi d - b}{\mu}\right]

The same energy is LI2/2LI^2/2, so L=2W/I2L = 2W/I^2. Substituting BB from (3), one power of the bracket cancels:

2WI2=Sμ0I2 μ02N2I2[b+(πd−b)/μ]2[b+πd−bμ]=μ0N2Sb+(πd−b)/μ\begin{aligned} \frac{2W}{I^2} &= \frac{S}{\mu_0 I^2}\,\frac{\mu_0^2N^2I^2}{\left[b + (\pi d - b)/\mu\right]^2}\left[b + \frac{\pi d - b}{\mu}\right]\\ &= \frac{\mu_0 N^2 S}{b + (\pi d - b)/\mu} \end{aligned}

which is the inductance (4) again.

Check

Limits of (4). Closing the gap, b→0b \to 0, gives μμ0N2S/πd\mu\mu_0 N^2 S/\pi d, the inductance of a toroid filled with the material; taking μ→∞\mu \to \infty gives μ0N2S/b\mu_0N^2S/b, the gap alone. Here the two terms of the denominator are 2.02.0 and 0.670.67 mm: their ratio is the energy ratio of (a), 3.03.0, as it must be, since the bracket in the energy of the last step shows each part’s energy in proportion to its term.

Remark

The energy and the flux routes agree because, with μ\mu taken as fixed at this current, the system is linear and its energy is LI2/2LI^2/2 whatever the shape of the field. Cutting a gap only 22 mm wide lowers the inductance from μμ0N2S/πd=0.60\mu\mu_0N^2S/\pi d = 0.60 H to 0.150.15 H, a factor of four, but it makes LL much less sensitive to μ\mu: a ten percent change in μ\mu now moves LL by only about two and a half percent, which is why chokes are built with a gap.