Skip to content

Inertia Against the Lorentz Force

Irodov 3.290DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.290

A metal disc of radius a=25a = 25 cm spins about its own axis with a constant angular velocity ω=130\omega = 130 rad/s. Find the potential difference between its center and its rim

  1. when there is no external magnetic field;

  2. when a uniform external magnetic field of induction B=5.0B = 5.0 mT is applied perpendicular to the disc.

The disc of radius a spinning about its axis O with angular velocity ω, and, for part (b), the field B normal to it. Neither sense is given; drawn counter-clockwise and out of the page.

The disc of radius aa spinning about its axis OO with angular velocity ω\omega, and, for part (b), the field B\vect B normal to it. Neither sense is given; drawn counter-clockwise and out of the page.

Given
  • a=25a = 25 cm
  • ω=130\omega = 130 rad/s
  • (b) B=5.0B = 5.0 mT normal to the disc
  • m=9.11×10−31m = 9.11\times10^{-31} kg
  • e=1.60×10−19e = 1.60\times10^{-19} C
Find
Δφ\Delta\varphi between center and rim, (a) and (b)

Solution

Step 1What holds an electron on its circle

A free electron at distance rr from the axis is carried round a circle at speed v=ωrv = \omega r, so the net force on it must be the centripetal force mω2rm\omega^2 r toward the axis. In the steady state the conduction electrons have redistributed until the fields inside the metal supply exactly that force. Writing r^\hat{\vect r} for the outward radial unit vector and −e-e for the electron’s charge:

−e(E+v×B)=−mω2r r^(1) -e\left(\vect E + \vect v\times\vect B\right) = -m\omega^2 r\,\hat{\vect r} \tag{1}
Step 2(a) No field: the electric field alone

With B=0\vect B = 0, (1) fixes the electric field inside the disc. It points radially outward, so that its force on the electron, −eE-e\vect E, points inward:

E=mω2re r^\vect E = \frac{m\omega^2 r}{e}\,\hat{\vect r}

The potential falls along E\vect E, so the center is the higher. Integrating from the center to the rim:

φcenter−φrim=∫0aE dr=mω2e∫0ar dr=mω2a22e\varphi_{\mathrm{center}} - \varphi_{\mathrm{rim}} = \int_0^a E\,dr = \frac{m\omega^2}{e}\int_0^a r\,dr = \frac{m\omega^2a^2}{2e}

Numerically,

Δφ=9.11×10−31×1302×0.2522×1.60×10−19 V\Delta\varphi = \frac{9.11\times10^{-31}\times130^2\times0.25^2}{2\times1.60\times10^{-19}}\ \text{V}
Δφ=mω2a22e=3.0 nV\Delta\varphi = \frac{m\omega^2a^2}{2e} = 3.0\ \text{nV}
(2)

The center is positive with respect to the rim: the electrons have been flung outward until the field holds them in.

Part (b): an element dr on a radius, moving at v normal to it, and the polarity of center and rim set by v· B for the senses drawn.

Part (b): an element drdr on a radius, moving at v\vect v normal to it, and the polarity of center and rim set by v×B\vect v\times\vect B for the senses drawn.

Step 3(b) With the field: the magnetic force dominates

Now v=ω×r\vect v = \vect\omega\times\vect r is normal to the radius, and with B\vect B normal to the disc the magnetic force −e v×B-e\,\vect v\times\vect B is radial, of magnitude eωrBe\omega rB. Its ratio to the centripetal term of (1) is

mω2reωrB=mωeB=9.11×10−31×1301.60×10−19×5.0×10−3≈1.5×10−7\frac{m\omega^2 r}{e\omega rB} = \frac{m\omega}{eB} = \frac{9.11\times10^{-31}\times130}{1.60\times10^{-19}\times5.0\times10^{-3}} \approx 1.5\times10^{-7}

so the centripetal term is negligible, and (1) reduces to the electric field cancelling the magnetic force:

E≈− v×B,E=ωrB\vect E \approx -\,\vect v\times\vect B, \qquad E = \omega rB

Integrating along a radius from the center to the rim:

∣Δφ∣=∫0aωBr dr|\Delta\varphi| = \int_0^a \omega Br\,dr

Numerically,

∣Δφ∣=130×5.0×10−3×0.2522 V|\Delta\varphi| = \frac{130\times5.0\times10^{-3}\times0.25^2}{2}\ \text{V}
∣Δφ∣≈ωBa22=20 mV|\Delta\varphi| \approx \frac{\omega Ba^2}{2} = 20\ \text{mV}
(3)

For the senses drawn, counter-clockwise rotation with B\vect B out of the page, v×B\vect v\times\vect B points outward and the rim is positive; reversing either sense makes the center positive.

Check

Dimensions: mω2a2/em\omega^2a^2/e is (kg⋅m2/s2)/C=J/C=V(\text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{s}^2)/\text{C} = \text{J/C} = \text{V}, and ωBa2\omega Ba^2 is s−1⋅T⋅m2=Wb/s=V\text{s}^{-1}\cdot\text{T}\cdot\text{m}^2 = \text{Wb/s} = \text{V}. The ratio of the two answers is the same small number found above, as it must be:

mω2a2/2eωBa2/2=mωeB≈1.5×10−7\frac{m\omega^2a^2/2e}{\omega Ba^2/2} = \frac{m\omega}{eB} \approx 1.5\times10^{-7}
Remark

Part (b) is the Faraday disc. Its emf is also the flux cut per unit time by one radius: in one turn, which takes 2π/ω2\pi/\omega, a radius sweeps the whole area πa2\pi a^2, so

Bπa22π/ω=ωBa22\frac{B\pi a^2}{2\pi/\omega} = \frac{\omega Ba^2}{2}

The inertial voltage of part (a) is real but tiny; the Tolman and Stewart experiments detected its transient cousin, the pulse of current when a spinning coil is stopped, and so measured e/me/m for the carriers in a metal.