Skip to content

Pulling Glass Against a Fixed Voltage

Irodov 3.201DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 2 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.201

A glass plate (permittivity ε=6.0\varepsilon = 6.0) completely fills the gap between the electrodes of a parallel-plate capacitor, whose capacitance without the glass would be C=20C = 20 nF. The capacitor is connected to a source of constant voltage V=100V = 100 V, and the glass plate is pulled out of the gap slowly and without friction. Find the change in the energy of the capacitor and the mechanical work done in pulling the plate out.

The capacitor with the glass plate of permittivity ε, which filled the gap, being drawn out with velocity v, and the source V across the plates.

The capacitor with the glass plate of permittivity ε\varepsilon, which filled the gap, being drawn out with velocity v\vect{v}, and the source VV across the plates.

Given
  • C=20C = 20 nF (no glass)
  • V=100V = 100 V
  • glass, ε=6.0\varepsilon = 6.0 (table value)
  • slow, frictionless extraction
  • source connected throughout
Find
the energy change ΔW\Delta W · the mechanical work AA

Solution

Step 1The capacitance with the glass in

Glass has the permittivity ε=6.0\varepsilon = 6.0 (a table value). With the gap completely filled, every field strength between the plates is ε\varepsilon times smaller at the same charge, so the capacitance is ε\varepsilon times larger:

C1=εC(1) C_1 = \varepsilon C \tag{1}

Pulling the glass out lowers the capacitance from C1C_1 to CC while the source holds the voltage at VV.

Step 2The change in the capacitor’s energy

At fixed voltage the energy is CV2/2CV^2/2, so the change from C1C_1 to CC is

ΔW=CV22−C1V22=(C−C1)V22(2) \Delta W = \frac{CV^2}{2} - \frac{C_1V^2}{2} = \frac{(C - C_1)V^2}{2} \tag{2}

By (1), the difference of capacitances is

C−C1=C−εC=−(ε−1)C(3) C - C_1 = C - \varepsilon C = -(\varepsilon - 1)C \tag{3}

Numerically:

CV2=20×10−9⋅1002 J=2.0×10−4 JΔW=−(6.0−1)⋅2.0×10−42 J\begin{aligned} CV^2 &= 20\times10^{-9}\cdot 100^2\ \text{J} = 2.0\times10^{-4}\ \text{J}\\[2pt] \Delta W &= -\frac{(6.0 - 1)\cdot 2.0\times10^{-4}}{2}\ \text{J} \end{aligned}
ΔW=−(ε−1)CV22=−0.50 mJ\Delta W = -\frac{(\varepsilon - 1)CV^2}{2} = -0.50\text{ mJ}
(4)

The capacitor loses energy: at fixed voltage, a smaller capacitance holds less.

Step 3The work done by the source

The charge on the capacitor falls from C1VC_1V to CVCV, and that charge is driven back into the source against its voltage. The work done by the source is therefore negative:

As=V Δq=(C−C1)V2(5) A_{\mathrm{s}} = V\,\Delta q = (C - C_1)V^2 \tag{5}
Step 4The mechanical work

The plate moves slowly and without friction, so it gains no kinetic energy, no heat is made at the surfaces, and the current is too small to produce Joule heat. The energy given to the capacitor equals the work of the external agent plus the work of the source:

ΔW=A+As\Delta W = A + A_{\mathrm{s}}

With (2) and (5), then (3):

A=ΔW−As=(C−C1)V22−(C−C1)V2=(C1−C)V22A = \Delta W - A_{\mathrm{s}} = \frac{(C - C_1)V^2}{2} - (C - C_1)V^2 = \frac{(C_1 - C)V^2}{2}
A=(ε−1)CV22=0.50 mJA = \frac{(\varepsilon - 1)CV^2}{2} = 0.50\text{ mJ}
(6)

The work is positive: the field draws the glass into the gap, so it has to be pulled out.

Check

Energy accounting with the numbers: the agent supplies 0.500.50 mJ and the capacitor gives up 0.500.50 mJ; the source takes in their sum, 1.01.0 mJ. That is the voltage times the charge returned to it, with C1=120C_1 = 120 nF from (1):

(C1−C)V⋅V=100×10−9⋅100⋅100 J=1.0 mJ(C_1 - C)V\cdot V = 100\times10^{-9}\cdot 100\cdot 100\ \text{J} = 1.0\ \text{mJ}

Limit: with ε=1\varepsilon = 1 the plate is no different from air and both answers vanish; with ε→∞\varepsilon \to \infty the plate acts like a metal filling the whole gap, and both grow without bound, as C1C_1 does.

Remark

The force is felt only while the plate’s edge is inside the gap, where the fringing field at the end pulls the glass in; the totals above do not depend on how that force varies along the way. Had the source been disconnected before the extraction, the charge would stay fixed and the energy would rise by the factor ε\varepsilon, from εCV2/2\varepsilon CV^2/2 to ε2CV2/2\varepsilon^2CV^2/2; the work, (ε−1)εCV2/2=3.0(\varepsilon - 1)\varepsilon CV^2/2 = 3.0 mJ, would then be ε\varepsilon times larger.