Skip to content

Two Wires, One Logarithm

Irodov 3.108DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 2 of 5

Problem Irodov 3.108

Two long straight parallel wires in air have the same cross-sectional radius aa, and their axes are a distance bb apart, with b≫ab \gg a. Find the mutual capacitance of the pair per unit length of the wires.

The two wires end on, each of radius a, with their axes a distance b apart (drawn schematically: the problem has b a).

The two wires end on, each of radius aa, with their axes a distance bb apart (drawn schematically: the problem has b≫ab \gg a).

Given
  • wire radius aa
  • axis separation b≫ab \gg a
  • air
Find
the mutual capacitance per unit length CC

Solution

Step 1The field between the wires

Put the charges λ\lambda and −λ-\lambda per unit length on the two wires. Since b≫ab \gg a, each wire barely disturbs the charge on the other, so the charge on each stays almost uniform round it and acts outside it like a line charge on its axis. For one line charge, by symmetry EE is radial and the same all round, so

E⋅2πrℓ=λℓε0E\cdot 2\pi r\ell = \frac{\lambda\ell}{\varepsilon_0}
The wires charged λ and -λ, and a point P on the line of centers at distance x from the positive wire's axis; both wires make the field there point toward the negative wire.

The wires charged λ\lambda and −λ-\lambda, and a point PP on the line of centers at distance xx from the positive wire’s axis; both wires make the field there point toward the negative wire.

At a point PP on the line of centers, a distance xx from the positive wire’s axis and b−xb - x from the negative one’s, both contributions point toward the negative wire and add:

E(x)=λ2πε0(1x+1b−x)(1) E(x) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{b - x}\right) \tag{1}
Step 2The voltage between the wires

The voltage is the integral of (1) along the line of centers, from the surface of one wire, x=ax = a, to the surface of the other, x=b−ax = b - a:

V=λ2πε0∫ab−a(1x+1b−x)dx=λ2πε0[ln⁡xb−x]ab−a=λ2πε0⋅2ln⁡b−aa=λπε0ln⁡b−aa\begin{aligned} V &= \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_a^{b-a}\left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{b - x}\right)dx = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left[\ln\frac{x}{b - x}\right]_a^{b-a}\\ &= \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\cdot 2\ln\frac{b - a}{a} = \frac{\lambda}{\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\frac{b - a}{a} \end{aligned}

For b≫ab \gg a, b−ab - a may be replaced by bb:

V≈λπε0ln⁡baV \approx \frac{\lambda}{\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\frac{b}{a}
Step 3The capacitance per unit length

The mutual capacitance per unit length is the charge per unit length over the voltage, C=λ/VC = \lambda/V:

C≈πε0ln⁡(b/a)C \approx \dfrac{\pi\varepsilon_0}{\ln(b/a)}
(2)
Check

Units: ε0\varepsilon_0 is in F/m and the logarithm is a pure number, so CC is a capacitance per unit length. Trend: moving the wires apart (larger bb) or thinning them (smaller aa) must lower the capacitance, since the same charge then needs a larger voltage, and the logarithm in the denominator grows in both cases. Against the exact treatment, in which the two cylinders are equipotentials of a pair of line charges ±λ\pm\lambda placed not on the axes but at the inverse points, a distance cc from the midpoint with c2=(b/2)2−a2c^2 = (b/2)^2 - a^2, and which gives πε0/arccosh⁡(b/2a)\pi\varepsilon_0/\operatorname{arccosh}(b/2a): for b≫ab \gg a, arccosh⁡(b/2a)≈ln⁡(b/a)\operatorname{arccosh}(b/2a) \approx \ln(b/a), the same result.

Remark

The capacitance depends on the geometry only through the logarithm of b/ab/a, so it is remarkably insensitive to it: moving the wires ten times farther apart changes CC only by the ratio of ln⁡(10b/a)\ln(10b/a) to ln⁡(b/a)\ln(b/a). For a typical two-wire line, b/ab/a of order 100, CC is about 6 pF per meter, or 6 nF per kilometer of line.