Skip to content

Gravity Slides Both Bodies at Once

Irodov 1.81DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.81

Prism 11, a right triangular wedge of mass m1m_1 and base angle α\alpha, rests on a horizontal floor and is free to slide on it. Bar 22, of mass m2m_2, sits on the prism’s sloped surface. All contact surfaces, floor to prism and prism to bar, are frictionless. Find the magnitude of prism 11’s horizontal acceleration.

Bar 2 on the frictionless slope of prism 1, base angle α; prism 1 is itself free to slide along the horizontal floor beneath it, which is frictionless too.

Bar 22 on the frictionless slope of prism 11, base angle α\alpha; prism 11 is itself free to slide along the horizontal floor beneath it, which is frictionless too.

Given
  • m1m_1
  • m2m_2
  • α\alpha
Find
the acceleration ww of prism 11

Solution

Step 1Decompose bar 2’s acceleration

Let ww be the prism’s horizontal acceleration and ara_r bar 22’s acceleration relative to the prism, up-slope positive. Bar 22’s acceleration in the lab frame is then

w2=(w+arcos⁡α, arsin⁡α)\vect w_2 = (w+a_r\cos\alpha,\ a_r\sin\alpha)
Step 2Newton’s second law for bar 2
The same arrangement with the two forces acting on bar 2: the slope's normal reaction N, perpendicular to the sloped face because that contact is frictionless, and the weight m_2 g.

The same arrangement with the two forces acting on bar 22: the slope’s normal reaction N\vect N, perpendicular to the sloped face because that contact is frictionless, and the weight m2gm_2\vect g.

The only forces on bar 22 are its weight m2gm_2\vect g and the slope’s normal reaction NN, along the outward normal (−sin⁡α,cos⁡α)(-\sin\alpha,\cos\alpha).

m2(w+arcos⁡α)=−Nsin⁡αm2arsin⁡α=Ncos⁡α−m2g\begin{align*} m_2(w+a_r\cos\alpha) &= -N\sin\alpha \tag{1} \\ m_2 a_r\sin\alpha &= N\cos\alpha-m_2 g \tag{2}\end{align*}
Step 3Newton’s second law for the prism

The only horizontal force on the frictionless prism is the horizontal component of bar 22’s reaction on it, equal and opposite to NN above.

m1w=Nsin⁡αm_1 w = N\sin\alpha
(3)
Step 4Eliminate NN and ara_r

Substituting N=m1w/sin⁡αN=m_1w/\sin\alpha from (3) into the bar’s horizontal equation (1) and solving for ara_r,

m2w+m2arcos⁡α=−m1war=−w(m1+m2)m2cos⁡α\begin{align*}m_2 w+m_2 a_r\cos\alpha &= -m_1 w \\ a_r &= -\dfrac{w(m_1+m_2)}{m_2\cos\alpha}\end{align*}

Substituting this ara_r and N=m1w/sin⁡αN=m_1w/\sin\alpha into the bar’s vertical equation (2),

−w(m1+m2)tan⁡α=m1wcot⁡α−m2gm2g=w[m1cot⁡α+(m1+m2)tan⁡α]\begin{align*}-w(m_1+m_2)\tan\alpha &= m_1 w\cot\alpha - m_2 g \\ m_2 g &= w\bigl[m_1\cot\alpha+(m_1+m_2)\tan\alpha\bigr]\end{align*}
w=m2gm1cot⁡α+(m1+m2)tan⁡αw = \dfrac{m_2 g}{m_1\cot\alpha+(m_1+m_2)\tan\alpha}
(4)

Multiplying the numerator and the denominator of (4) by sin⁡αcos⁡α\sin\alpha\cos\alpha clears the cotangent and the tangent; regrouping the denominator then lets the Pythagorean identity collect the two m1m_1 terms.

w=m2gsin⁡αcos⁡αm1cos⁡2α+(m1+m2)sin⁡2α=m2gsin⁡αcos⁡αm1(cos⁡2α+sin⁡2α)+m2sin⁡2α=m2gsin⁡αcos⁡αm1+m2sin⁡2α\begin{align*}w &= \frac{m_2 g\sin\alpha\cos\alpha}{m_1\cos^2\alpha+(m_1+m_2)\sin^2\alpha} \\ &= \frac{m_2 g\sin\alpha\cos\alpha}{m_1(\cos^2\alpha+\sin^2\alpha)+m_2\sin^2\alpha} \\ &= \frac{m_2 g\sin\alpha\cos\alpha}{m_1+m_2\sin^2\alpha}\end{align*}

Dividing the numerator and the denominator by m2m_2 then puts the result in the book’s own form.

w=gsin⁡αcos⁡αsin⁡2α+m1/m2w = \dfrac{g\sin\alpha\cos\alpha}{\sin^2\alpha+m_1/m_2}
(5)
Check

As m2/m1→0m_2/m_1\to0 (a negligible bar), w→0w\to0: nothing pushes the prism if there is nothing on it. As α→90∘\alpha\to90^\circ (a vertical face bar 22 cannot actually rest on), sin⁡αcos⁡α→0\sin\alpha\cos\alpha\to0 and w→0w\to0 too, consistent with Nsin⁡α→0N\sin\alpha\to0 carrying no horizontal push at all.

Remark

Bar 22’s vertical acceleration being nonzero is not, by itself, what sets this problem apart: even a block sliding down a fixed, stationary incline has a nonzero vertical acceleration (gsin⁡αg\sin\alpha along the slope has a vertical component gsin⁡2αg\sin^2\alpha). What is different here is that bar 22’s lab-frame acceleration is no longer directed along the slope at all, since the slope itself is accelerating out from under it; conflating “the acceleration along the slope” with “the acceleration relative to the ground” is the standard error this problem is built to catch.