Skip to content

A Second Pulley Halves the Pull

Irodov 1.75DifficultyDifficulty 4 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.75

A fixed pulley P1P_1 carries a thread with ball 11 (mass m1m_1) hanging from one end; the other end holds the axle of a second, movable pulley P2P_2. A separate thread wraps around P2P_2: one end carries rod 22 (mass m2m_2, length ll), the other end is anchored to a fixed support. All pulleys and threads are massless and frictionless, and m1=ηm2m_1 = \eta m_2 with η=1.8\eta = 1.8, l=100 cml = 100\ \text{cm}. Ball 11 starts at rest level with rod 22’s lower end. Find the time tt until ball 11 is level with rod 22’s upper end.

Ball 1 hangs from the fixed pulley P_1's far strand; P_1's other strand carries the axle of the movable pulley P_2. A second thread wraps P_2, with rod 2 on its open (left) strand and a fixed anchor on the other.

Ball 11 hangs from the fixed pulley P1P_1’s far strand; P1P_1’s other strand carries the axle of the movable pulley P2P_2. A second thread wraps P2P_2, with rod 22 on its open (left) strand and a fixed anchor on the other.

Given
  • m1=ηm2m_1 = \eta m_2, η=1.8\eta = 1.8
  • l=100l = 100 cm
  • massless pulleys and threads, no friction
Find
the time tt

Solution

Step 1The movable pulley’s force balance
Force balance on the massless movable pulley P_2: one strand at T_1 (from P_1) against two strands at T_2 (wrapped, to rod 2 and the anchor).

Force balance on the massless movable pulley P2P_2: one strand at T1T_1 (from P1P_1) against two strands at T2T_2 (wrapped, to rod 22 and the anchor).

P2P_2 is massless, so the single strand T1T_1 holding its axle (continued from P1P_1’s thread, which also carries ball 11) must balance the two strands of T2T_2 pulling down on its rim.

T1=2T2T_1 = 2T_2
(1)
Step 2Two kinematic constraints, chained through P2P_2

Taking downward as positive throughout, and writing w1w_1, w2w_2, wQw_Q for the (constant) accelerations of ball 11, rod 22, and pulley P2P_2 itself: P1P_1’s thread has fixed length, with ball 11 on one end and P2P_2’s axle on the other, so as one descends the other rises by the same amount,

wQ=−w1.w_Q = -w_1.

The second thread wraps P2P_2 with rod 22’s end at position y2y_2 on its free strand and a fixed anchor at the constant position yay_a on the other; the sum of the two strand lengths, measured down from P2P_2 at yQy_Q, is fixed,

(ya−yQ)+(y2−yQ)=const.(y_a-y_Q) + (y_2-y_Q) = \text{const}.

Differentiating twice, with yay_a constant,

−2wQ+w2=0w2=2wQ\begin{align*} -2w_Q + w_2 &= 0 \\ w_2 &= 2w_Q \tag{2}\end{align*}

Combining the two,

w2=−2w1w_2 = -2w_1
(3)
Step 3Newton’s second law for the two loads
m1w1=m1g−T1m2w2=m2g−T2\begin{align*} m_1 w_1 &= m_1 g - T_1 \tag{4} \\ m_2 w_2 &= m_2 g - T_2 \tag{5}\end{align*}
Step 4Solving for the accelerations

Solving (4) and (5) for the two tensions and putting both into the pulley balance (1),

T1=m1(g−w1)T2=m2(g−w2)m1(g−w1)=2m2(g−w2)\begin{align*}T_1 &= m_1(g-w_1)\\ T_2 &= m_2(g-w_2)\\ m_1(g-w_1) &= 2m_2(g-w_2)\end{align*}

Replacing w2w_2 by −2w1-2w_1 with (3), then expanding and collecting the w1w_1 terms with m1=ηm2m_1=\eta m_2,

m1(g−w1)=2m2(g+2w1)m1g−2m2g=m1w1+4m2w1(η−2)m2g=(η+4)m2w1\begin{align*}m_1(g-w_1) &= 2m_2(g+2w_1)\\ m_1 g - 2m_2 g &= m_1 w_1 + 4m_2 w_1\\ (\eta-2)m_2 g &= (\eta+4)m_2 w_1\end{align*}

so that

w1=(η−2)gη+4w_1 = \dfrac{(\eta-2)g}{\eta+4}
(6)

Rod 22’s acceleration then follows from (3),

w2=−2w1=2(2−η)gη+4(7)w_2 = -2w_1 = \frac{2(2-\eta)g}{\eta+4} \tag{7}
Step 5The time for ball 1 to reach the rod’s upper end

Ball 11 starts level with rod 22’s lower end; it must end up level with the upper end, a distance ll higher on the rod, so rod 22’s own descent must exceed ball 11’s descent by exactly ll (the same bookkeeping as Step 1 of the sliding-ball problem earlier in this section):

x2(t)−x1(t)=l,x1=w1t22, x2=w2t22x_2(t)-x_1(t) = l, \qquad x_1=\dfrac{w_1t^2}{2},\ x_2=\dfrac{w_2t^2}{2}

Dividing out the common factor t2/2t^2/2 and solving for t2t^2,

t2=2lw2−w1t^2 = \frac{2l}{w_2-w_1}

Substituting the accelerations (6) and (7),

w2−w1=2(2−η)gη+4−(η−2)gη+4=2(2−η)g+(2−η)gη+4=3(2−η)gη+4\begin{align*}w_2-w_1 &= \frac{2(2-\eta)g}{\eta+4} - \frac{(\eta-2)g}{\eta+4} \\ &= \frac{2(2-\eta)g+(2-\eta)g}{\eta+4}\\ &= \frac{3(2-\eta)g}{\eta+4}\end{align*}
t=2l(4+η)3g(2−η)t = \sqrt{\dfrac{2l(4+\eta)}{3g(2-\eta)}}
(8)
Check

With η=1.8\eta=1.8, l=1l=1 m and g=9.8 m/s2g=9.8\ \text{m/s}^2: 2l(4+η)=2(5.8)=11.62l(4+\eta)=2(5.8)=11.6, 3g(2−η)=3(9.8)(0.2)=5.883g(2-\eta)=3(9.8)(0.2)=5.88, so t=11.6/5.88=1.973=1.4t=\sqrt{11.6/5.88}=\sqrt{1.973}=1.4 s, matching the book’s numeric answer. Also, η<2\eta<2 makes w1<0w_1<0 in Step 4: ball 11 (only 1.8×1.8\times rod 22’s mass) is not heavy enough to overcome P2P_2’s 2:1 mechanical disadvantage, so it actually accelerates upward (w1<0w_1<0) while rod 22 descends. The geometry itself only demands the relative displacement x2−x1=lx_2-x_1=l, exactly as in problem 1.74, where both bodies moved in the same direction, downward, while still satisfying an analogous relative condition; ball 11’s own upward acceleration here is a consequence of η<2\eta<2’s specific force balance, not a requirement of the setup.

Remark

The force relation T1=2T2T_1=2T_2 from (1) and the kinematic relation w2=2wQw_2=2w_Q from (2) are reciprocal, as they must be for a massless, frictionless pulley: it stores no energy, so the power the axle strand delivers to P2P_2 must equal the power its two rim strands carry away, T1vQ=2T2vQT_1v_Q=2T_2v_Q, which forces the tension ratio to be the inverse of the speed ratio. That reciprocity is why rod 22’s weight, carried back through P2P_2’s two rim strands to its axle, is felt at P1P_1’s thread doubled, T1=2T2T_1=2T_2, the same factor of two by which rod 22’s own end outpaces P2P_2.