Skip to content

The Pulley That Rides Its Own Rope

Irodov 1.73DifficultyDifficulty 4 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.73

A block of mass m0m_0 rests on a frictionless horizontal table and is tied by a horizontal thread that runs to a fixed pulley mounted at the table’s edge and then straight down to the axle of a second, movable pulley hanging in the air. A separate thread passes around that movable pulley, carrying a block of mass m1m_1 on one end and a block of mass m2m_2 on the other. All pulleys and threads are massless, and there is no friction anywhere. Find the acceleration of m1m_1, and examine the possible cases.

Block m_0 on a frictionless table, joined over a fixed pulley to a movable pulley; a second thread passing round the movable pulley carries m_1 on the left and m_2 on the right.

Block m0m_0 on a frictionless table, joined over a fixed pulley to a movable pulley; a second thread passing round the movable pulley carries m1m_1 on the left and m2m_2 on the right.

Given
  • m0m_0
  • m1m_1
  • m2m_2
  • frictionless table
  • massless pulleys and threads
Find
the acceleration of m1m_1, and the possible cases

Solution

Step 1Naming the two tensions

Call T1T_1 the tension in the thread that runs from m0m_0 over the fixed pulley down to the axle of the movable pulley, and T2T_2 the tension in the second thread, the one that passes round the movable pulley and carries m1m_1 on one end and m2m_2 on the other.

Step 2Force balance on the massless pulley

Because the movable pulley and both threads are massless, Newton’s second law applied to the pulley alone reads (mass) times (acceleration) with the mass equal to zero, so the net force on it is zero however fast it is accelerating.

The axle strand pulls the pulley up with T1T_1; the wrapped strand pulls it down with T2T_2 on each of its two sides, so

T1=2T2T_1 = 2T_2
(1)
Step 3Newton’s second law for each body

Let w0w_0 be the acceleration of m0m_0 along the table, taken positive toward the fixed pulley (the direction T1T_1 pulls it), and let w1w_1, w2w_2 be the accelerations of m1m_1, m2m_2, both taken positive downward. The table is frictionless and horizontal, so the only horizontal force on m0m_0 is T1T_1; each hanging body carries its own weight and the single tension T2T_2:

T1=m0w0m1g−T2=m1w1m2g−T2=m2w2\begin{align*} T_1 &= m_0 w_0 \tag{2} \\ m_1 g - T_2 &= m_1 w_1 \tag{3} \\ m_2 g - T_2 &= m_2 w_2 \tag{4}\end{align*}
Step 4The two thread constraints

The thread over the fixed pulley has a fixed total length. Writing x0x_0 for m0m_0’s distance from the fixed pulley and yQy_Q for the movable pulley’s depth below it, that length is x0+yQx_0+y_Q, so

x0+yQ=constx_0 + y_Q = \text{const}

Differentiating twice in time, and reading each acceleration in the positive sense already chosen (m0m_0 toward the pulley, the pulley downward),

where wQw_Q is the movable pulley’s own downward acceleration. The second thread, wound round the movable pulley with m1m_1 on one end and m2m_2 on the other, also has fixed length: the sum of the two strand lengths, measured from the movable pulley down to each load, is constant,

(y1−yQ)+(y2−yQ)=const(y_1 - y_Q) + (y_2 - y_Q) = \text{const}

Differentiating this twice in time as well,

y¨1+y¨2−2 y¨Q=0,w1+w2=2wQ\ddot y_1 + \ddot y_2 - 2\,\ddot y_Q = 0, \qquad w_1 + w_2 = 2w_Q

Substituting wQ=w0w_Q = w_0 from (5) gives the constraint

w1+w2=2w0w_1 + w_2 = 2w_0
(6)
Step 5Solve for the acceleration of m0m_0

Eliminating T1T_1 between (2) and the pulley balance (1) puts the wrapped-strand tension in terms of w0w_0 alone,

T2=T12=m0w02\begin{align*}T_2 &= \frac{T_1}{2}\\ &= \frac{m_0 w_0}{2}\end{align*}

Substituting that into (3) and (4) and solving each for its own acceleration,

w1=g−m0w02m1,w2=g−m0w02m2w_1 = g - \frac{m_0 w_0}{2m_1}, \qquad w_2 = g - \frac{m_0 w_0}{2m_2}

Adding the two and using the constraint (6) on the left,

2g−m0w02(1m1+1m2)=2w02g - \frac{m_0 w_0}{2}\left(\frac{1}{m_1}+\frac{1}{m_2}\right) = 2w_0

Multiplying through by 2m1m22m_1 m_2 and collecting the w0w_0 terms,

4m1m2g−m0w0(m1+m2)=4m1m2w04m1m2g=w0[4m1m2+m0(m1+m2)]\begin{align*}4m_1 m_2 g - m_0 w_0(m_1+m_2) &= 4m_1 m_2 w_0\\ 4m_1 m_2 g &= w_0\bigl[4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)\bigr]\end{align*}

so that

w0=4m1m2 g4m1m2+m0(m1+m2)(7)w_0 = \frac{4m_1 m_2\, g}{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)} \tag{7}
Step 6Acceleration of m1m_1

Substituting (7) back into Step 5’s w1=g−m0w0/(2m1)w_1 = g - m_0 w_0/(2m_1),

w1=g−m02m1⋅4m1m2 g4m1m2+m0(m1+m2)=g−2m0m2 g4m1m2+m0(m1+m2)=g[4m1m2+m0(m1+m2)−2m0m24m1m2+m0(m1+m2)]\begin{align*}w_1 &= g - \frac{m_0}{2m_1}\cdot\frac{4m_1 m_2\, g}{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)}\\ &= g - \frac{2m_0 m_2\, g}{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)}\\ &= g\left[\frac{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2) - 2m_0 m_2} {4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)}\right]\end{align*}

The numerator’s two m0m_0 terms collect,

m0(m1+m2)−2m0m2=m0(m1−m2)m_0(m_1+m_2) - 2m_0 m_2 = m_0(m_1-m_2)

so that

w1=4m1m2+m0(m1−m2)4m1m2+m0(m1+m2) gw_1 = \dfrac{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1-m_2)}{4m_1 m_2 + m_0(m_1+m_2)}\,g
(8)
Check

Let m0→∞m_0\to\infty: the formula reduces to w1→g(m1−m2)/(m1+m2)w_1 \to g(m_1-m_2)/(m_1+m_2), the ordinary two-body Atwood result. That is the right limit, because an infinitely massive m0m_0 resists T1T_1 with infinite inertia, w0→0w_0\to 0, the movable pulley stops descending, and m1m_1, m2m_2 then hang from what is effectively one fixed pulley.

Remark

w1w_1 was defined positive downward, and the sign of its numerator, 4m1m2+m0(m1−m2)4m_1m_2+m_0(m_1-m_2), is not fixed: whenever m1≥m2m_1\ge m_2 every term is positive and m1m_1 accelerates down. But if m2m_2 is heavier and m0(m2−m1)>4m1m2m_0(m_2-m_1) > 4m_1m_2, the numerator turns negative and m1m_1 accelerates upward instead, dragged by m2m_2 through the movable pulley even though gravity alone pulls m1m_1 down. This sign change, not a separate machine, is what “look into possible cases” is asking for.