Skip to content

Two Vectors, Seventeen Degrees Apart

Irodov 1.56DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 2 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.56

A rigid body rotates with an angular velocity vector ω(t)=at i+bt2 j\vect\omega(t) = at\,\vect i + bt^2\,\vect j, where a=0.50a = 0.50 rad/s2^2, b=0.060b = 0.060 rad/s3^3, and i\vect i, j\vect j are the unit vectors along the xx and yy axes. Find:

  1. the magnitudes of the angular velocity and the angular acceleration at the instant t=10.0t = 10.0 s

  2. the angle between the angular velocity vector and the angular acceleration vector at that same instant

The angular velocity at a general instant, drawn at an arbitrary pose, with the two components the statement gives: at along the x axis and bt^2 along the y axis. Both grow with time, at different rates.

The angular velocity at a general instant, drawn at an arbitrary pose, with the two components the statement gives: atat along the xx axis and bt2bt^2 along the yy axis. Both grow with time, at different rates.

Given
  • ω(t)=at i+bt2j\vect\omega(t) = at\,\vect{i}+bt^2\vect{j}
  • a=0.50a=0.50 rad/s2^2
  • b=0.060b=0.060 rad/s3^3
  • t=10.0t=10.0 s
Find
(a) ω\omega and β=∣ω˙∣\beta=|\dot{\vect\omega}| at tt, (b) the angle between ω\vect\omega and β\vect\beta

Solution

Step 1Read off the angular velocity components

At the given instant ω\vect\omega has components ωx=at\omega_x=at, ωy=bt2\omega_y=bt^2, so its modulus is the root sum of their squares,

ω=ωx2+ωy2=a2t2+b2t4.\omega = \sqrt{\omega_x^2+\omega_y^2} = \sqrt{a^2t^2+b^2t^4}.

Factoring a2t2a^2t^2 out from under the root,

ω=at1+(bt/a)2\omega = at\sqrt{1+(bt/a)^2}
(1)
Step 2Differentiate for the angular acceleration

The angular acceleration is β=dω/dt\vect\beta=d\vect\omega/dt, with components βx=a\beta_x=a (a genuine constant) and βy=2bt\beta_y=2bt (which still grows with tt), so its modulus is

β=βx2+βy2=a2+4b2t2.\beta = \sqrt{\beta_x^2+\beta_y^2} = \sqrt{a^2+4b^2t^2}.

Factoring a2a^2 out from under the root,

β=a1+(2bt/a)2\beta = a\sqrt{1+(2bt/a)^2}
(2)
Step 3Evaluate both at t=10.0t=10.0 s
ωx=at=5.0 rad/s,ωy=bt2=6.0 rad/s,(3)\omega_x = at = 5.0\text{ rad/s},\qquad \omega_y = bt^2 = 6.0\text{ rad/s}, \tag{3}
βx=a=0.50 rad/s2,βy=2bt=1.2 rad/s2.(4)\beta_x = a = 0.50\text{ rad/s}^2,\qquad \beta_y = 2bt = 1.2\text{ rad/s}^2. \tag{4}
ω=5.02+6.02 rad/s≈8 rad/sβ=0.502+1.22 rad/s2=1.3 rad/s2\begin{gathered}\omega = \sqrt{5.0^2+6.0^2}\text{ rad/s} \approx 8\text{ rad/s}\\ \beta = \sqrt{0.50^2+1.2^2}\text{ rad/s}^2 = 1.3\text{ rad/s}^2\end{gathered}
(5)
Step 4The angle between ω\vect\omega and β\vect\beta
cos⁡θ=ω⋅βωβ=ωxβx+ωyβyωβ=5.0×0.50+6.0×1.27.81×1.3.(6)\cos\theta = \frac{\vect\omega\cdot\vect\beta}{\omega\beta} = \frac{\omega_x\beta_x+\omega_y\beta_y}{\omega\beta} = \frac{5.0\times0.50+6.0\times1.2}{7.81\times1.3}. \tag{6}
θ=arccos⁡ωxβx+ωyβyωβ≈17∘\theta = \arccos\dfrac{\omega_x\beta_x+\omega_y\beta_y}{\omega\beta} \approx 17^\circ
(7)
The two vectors at t=10.0 s, drawn at the directions their components fix (though not at their true relative lengths): ω at (ω_y/ω_x)50.2° from the x axis and β at (β_y/β_x)67.4°. The wedge between them is the angle θ boxed above.

The two vectors at t=10.0t=10.0 s, drawn at the directions their components fix (though not at their true relative lengths): ω\vect\omega at arctan⁡(ωy/ωx)≈50.2∘\arctan(\omega_y/\omega_x)\approx50.2^\circ from the xx axis and β\vect\beta at arctan⁡(βy/βx)≈67.4∘\arctan(\beta_y/\beta_x)\approx67.4^\circ. The wedge between them is the angle θ\theta boxed above.

Check

The two direction angles found straight from the components, arctan⁡(6.0/5.0)≈50.2∘\arctan(6.0/5.0)\approx50.2^\circ for ω\vect\omega and arctan⁡(1.2/0.50)≈67.4∘\arctan(1.2/0.50)\approx67.4^\circ for β\vect\beta, differ by 17.2∘17.2^\circ, matching the dot-product answer independently: the figure’s angle θ\theta was drawn at these two directions, not guessed.

Remark

Because ω(t)\vect\omega(t)’s own direction drifts, arctan⁡(bt/a)\arctan(bt/a) growing with tt, this is rotation about an axis that sweeps rather than one fixed in space; β\vect\beta is not simply describing how fast the body spins up but also how fast that axis is turning, which is precisely why β\vect\beta points off at a different angle from ω\vect\omega rather than lying along it as it would for spin-up about a fixed axis.