Skip to content

Same Moment, Two Different Answers

Irodov 1.354DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.354

Two long chains of clocks, KK and K′K', lie along a common line and move relative to each other at a constant velocity vv; each chain is mutually synchronized in its own rest frame, with a fixed proper spacing l0l_0 between neighboring clocks. At the instant one particular clock of the moving chain, A′A', passes directly opposite one particular clock of the stationary chain, AA, both AA and A′A' are set to read zero, and that instant is taken as the start of the time count. Sketch the approximate hand positions of every clock in both chains at that moment, first as judged “in terms of the KK clocks”, and then as judged “in terms of the K′K' clocks”.

Two chains of seven clocks. The upper chain, frame K', slides to the right at v; the instant drawn is the one at which A' is level with A.

Two chains of seven clocks. The upper chain, frame K′K', slides to the right at vv; the instant drawn is the one at which A′A' is level with AA.

Given
  • two chains of clocks, each synchronized in its own rest frame
  • relative velocity vv
  • proper spacing l0l_0 between neighbors
  • AA and A′A' both set to zero as they pass
Find
Draw what every clock reads at that moment, first as KK judges the moment, then as K′K' judges it

Solution

Step 1Deciding what the question is asking

“At this moment” is not one question but two, and that is the whole content of the problem. A moment is a set of events, one at each clock, and the set is different in the two frames. “In terms of the KK clocks” means the set of events that all carry the same reading on the KK chain, that is, the slice t=0t = 0 of frame KK. “In terms of the K′K' clocks” means the slice t′=0t' = 0 of frame K′K'. The two slices agree at AA and A′A', where they were defined to agree, and nowhere else.

Step 2The transformation that carries a time between the frames

Put the xx axis along the chains, with the origin of both frames at the event “A′A' passes AA”, and let K′K' move at +v+v. Then the Lorentz transformation of the time coordinate is

t′=γ(t−vxc2),γ=11−v2/c2,(1)t' = \gamma\left(t - \frac{vx}{c^{2}}\right), \qquad \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^{2}/c^{2}}}, \tag{1}

and its inverse, obtained by exchanging primed for unprimed and reversing the sign of vv,

t=γ(t′+vx′c2).(2)t = \gamma\left(t' + \frac{vx'}{c^{2}}\right). \tag{2}
Step 3Where the moving clocks are on the slice t=0t = 0

Take the slice t=0t = 0. Number the K′K' clocks by nn, counting from A′A' and taking nn positive in the direction of motion, so that the nn-th one sits permanently at xn′=n l0x'_{n} = n\,l_{0} in its own frame, where l0l_{0} is the proper spacing of neighboring clocks. In KK that chain is moving, so its spacing is contracted and

xn=xn′γ=n l0γ.x_{n} = \frac{x'_{n}}{\gamma} = \frac{n\,l_{0}}{\gamma}.

Now read the reading of that clock off (1) with t=0t = 0:

tn′=γ(0−vxnc2),=−γ vc2⋅n l0γ.\begin{aligned} t'_{n} &= \gamma\left(0 - \frac{v x_{n}}{c^{2}}\right), \\ &= -\gamma\,\frac{v}{c^{2}}\cdot\frac{n\,l_{0}}{\gamma}. \end{aligned}

The two factors of γ\gamma cancel, leaving

tn′=− n vl0c2.t'_{n} = -\,n\,\frac{v l_{0}}{c^{2}} .

Writing τ=vl0/c2\tau = v l_{0}/c^{2} for the stagger between neighbors:

tn′=− nτt'_{n} = -\,n\tau
(3)
Step 4Reading the answer off, in terms of the KK clocks

Every KK clock reads 00, because t=0t = 0 is what the slice was defined to be and the KK chain is synchronized in KK. The K′K' clocks are staggered by τ\tau per clock, and the sign in (3) says that the ones ahead in the direction of motion (n>0n > 0) read negative, that is, they lag, while the ones at the rear (n<0n < 0) read positive and so run ahead. The K′K' chain is also drawn shorter, by the factor 1/γ1/\gamma, because that is how KK measures a moving chain.

In terms of the K clocks. All seven K clocks read 0; the K' hands step back by τ = v l_0/c^2 from each clock to the next one forward, so the rear of the moving chain runs ahead.

In terms of the KK clocks. All seven KK clocks read 00; the K′K' hands step back by τ=vl0/c2\tau = v l_{0}/c^{2} from each clock to the next one forward, so the rear of the moving chain runs ahead.

Step 5Now the other slice, in terms of the K′K' clocks

Repeat the argument with the frames exchanged. On the slice t′=0t' = 0 every K′K' clock reads 00. Number the KK clocks by mm from AA, again positive in the direction in which K′K' moves, so that the mm-th one sits permanently at xm=m l0x_{m} = m\,l_{0} in KK. In K′K' the KK chain is the moving one, so its spacing is contracted and

xm′=xmγ=m l0γ.x'_{m} = \frac{x_{m}}{\gamma} = \frac{m\,l_{0}}{\gamma}.

Putting t′=0t' = 0 into (2),

tm=γ(0+vc2⋅m l0γ)=+ mτ,t_{m} = \gamma\left(0 + \frac{v}{c^{2}}\cdot\frac{m\,l_{0}}{\gamma}\right) = +\,m\tau,

with the same cancellation of γ\gamma. The sign is now positive, so on this slice the KK clocks ahead in the +x+x direction are the ones that read ahead. That is the same physical rule as before and not a different one: in K′K' the chain that is moving is KK, and it moves in the −x-x direction, so its rear is on the right, and it is again the rear of the moving chain whose hands are advanced.

In terms of the K' clocks. Now the K' chain reads 0 throughout and is drawn at full length, while K is the contracted chain moving left, its hands stepping forward by τ toward the right, which is its rear.

In terms of the K′K' clocks. Now the K′K' chain reads 00 throughout and is drawn at full length, while KK is the contracted chain moving left, its hands stepping forward by τ\tau toward the right, which is its rear.

slice t=0:tn′=− nτslice t′=0:tm=+ mττ=vl0c2\begin{aligned} \text{slice } t = 0 : &\quad t'_{n} = -\,n\tau \\ \text{slice } t' = 0 : &\quad t_{m} = +\,m\tau \end{aligned} \qquad \tau = \frac{v l_{0}}{c^{2}}
(4)

In words, and this is what the two panels draw: whichever chain is the moving one shows its rear clocks ahead, by vl0/c2v l_0/c^2 from each clock to the next.

Check

Transform one of the drawn readings back and see whether it returns. Take the K′K' clock next in front of A′A': on the first panel it sits at x′=l0x' = l_{0} and reads t′=−τt' = -\tau. Feeding those into (2) gives t=γ(−vl0/c2+vl0/c2)=0t = \gamma(-v l_{0}/c^{2} + v l_{0}/c^{2}) = 0, so that event really is on the slice t=0t = 0, as the panel claims. The clock A′A' itself gives n=0n = 0 and t′=0t' = 0 in both panels, which is the time origin the problem fixes, so neither drawing contradicts the other where they must agree. Dimensionally [vl0/c2]=(m/s)(m)/(m2/s2)=s[v l_{0}/c^{2}] = (\text{m/s})(\text{m})/(\text{m}^2/\text{s}^2) = \text{s}, a time, as a clock reading must be.

Remark

The two panels are mirror images of each other, and the principle of relativity requires that they be: neither chain is the one that is “really” moving, so any statement true of K′K' as seen from KK must hold for KK as seen from K′K' with the direction of motion reversed. Reading the first panel as “the moving clocks are simply out of step” is safe; reading it as “the moving clocks are slow” is not, since the stagger drawn here carries no factor of γ\gamma and is a fact about simultaneity rather than about rates. The rates only show up when a single clock is watched over an interval, which is a different picture from this one.