Skip to content

Sticking Together Always Burns Energy

Irodov 1.278DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 2 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.278

Two horizontal discs turn freely, without friction at their bearings, about one and the same vertical axis through both their centers. Their moments of inertia about that axis are I1I_1 and I2I_2, and they are spinning with angular velocities ω1\vect\omega_1 and ω2\vect\omega_2, both directed along the axis. The upper disc, of moment of inertia I1I_1, then drops onto the lower one. Their faces rub, and after a while the two turn together as one body. Find:

  1. the common angular velocity ω\vect\omega once the sliding has stopped

  2. the work AA done by the friction forces between the two faces over the whole episode

The two discs on their common vertical axis before the drop, the upper one of moment of inertia I_1 turning at ω_1 and the lower one of I_2 at ω_2.

The two discs on their common vertical axis before the drop, the upper one of moment of inertia I1I_1 turning at ω1\vect\omega_1 and the lower one of I2I_2 at ω2\vect\omega_2.

The lower disc seen from above while the faces are still sliding, with the friction couple N_fr that the upper face exerts on it. The upper disc feels exactly the opposite couple.

The lower disc seen from above while the faces are still sliding, with the friction couple Nfr\vect N_{\mathrm{fr}} that the upper face exerts on it. The upper disc feels exactly the opposite couple.

Given
  • I1I_1
  • I2I_2
  • ω1\omega_1
  • ω2\omega_2
Find
(a) ω\omega, (b) AA

Solution

Step 1The axis feels no external moment, so LzL_z carries across

The friction between the two faces acts on both discs at once, with equal and opposite couples about the axis, so it cancels out of the total. Everything else that touches the discs (their weights, the normal load between them, the frictionless bearings) either acts along the axis or is applied at it. The angular momentum of the pair about the axis is therefore the same before the drop and after the sliding has ceased, and each disc contributes its own IωI\omega.

I1ω1+I2ω2=(I1+I2) ω(1) I_1\vect\omega_1 + I_2\vect\omega_2 = (I_1+I_2)\,\vect\omega \tag{1}

Dividing through by the combined moment of inertia gives the steady state.

ω=I1ω1+I2ω2I1+I2\vect\omega = \dfrac{I_1\vect\omega_1+I_2\vect\omega_2}{I_1+I_2}
(2)
The pair once the sliding has died away, resting one on the other and turning as a single body at the common ω. The sense drawn is the case I_1ω_1+I_2ω_2>0.

The pair once the sliding has died away, resting one on the other and turning as a single body at the common ω\vect\omega. The sense drawn is the case I1ω1+I2ω2>0I_1\omega_1+I_2\omega_2>0.

Step 2The energy that the sliding faces removed

All three angular velocities point along the one axis, so from here on ω1\omega_1, ω2\omega_2 and ω\omega stand for their signed components along it. The friction couples act on the two discs through different angles, since the faces are sliding over one another, so their two contributions do not cancel in the work account the way they canceled in the moment account. All of the work of the friction couples goes into the change of rotational kinetic energy, because nothing else exerts a moment about the axis; the fall of the upper disc and the impact that arrests it do their work on the vertical motion, which is uncoupled from the spin and enters neither KiK_{\mathrm{i}} nor KfK_{\mathrm{f}}. First the two rotational energies, the initial one a sum over separate discs and the final one a single body turning at ω\omega.

Ki=12I1ω12+12I2ω22Kf=12(I1+I2) ω2\begin{align*}K_{\mathrm{i}} &= \frac{1}{2}I_1\omega_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}I_2\omega_2^2 \\ K_{\mathrm{f}} &= \frac{1}{2}(I_1+I_2)\,\omega^2\end{align*}

Substituting the ω\omega of (1) into KfK_{\mathrm{f}} and subtracting gives the work over a common denominator.

A=(I1ω1+I2ω2)2−(I1+I2)(I1ω12+I2ω22)2(I1+I2)A = \dfrac{(I_1\omega_1+I_2\omega_2)^2 - (I_1+I_2)(I_1\omega_1^2+I_2\omega_2^2)}{2(I_1+I_2)}
(3)
Step 3The numerator collapses to a perfect square

Expanding both products in the numerator of (3) is the whole of the remaining work; the squared terms cancel in pairs and what is left is a cross term.

(I1ω1+I2ω2)2=I12ω12+2I1I2ω1ω2+I22ω22(I1+I2)(I1ω12+I2ω22)=I12ω12+I1I2ω22+I1I2ω12+I22ω22\begin{align*}(I_1\omega_1+I_2\omega_2)^2 &= I_1^2\omega_1^2 + 2I_1I_2\omega_1\omega_2 + I_2^2\omega_2^2 \\ (I_1+I_2)(I_1\omega_1^2+I_2\omega_2^2) &= I_1^2\omega_1^2 + I_1I_2\omega_2^2 + I_1I_2\omega_1^2 + I_2^2\omega_2^2\end{align*}

Subtracting the second line from the first leaves −I1I2-I_1I_2 multiplying ω12−2ω1ω2+ω22\omega_1^2 - 2\omega_1\omega_2 + \omega_2^2, which is a perfect square.

(I1ω1+I2ω2)2−(I1+I2)(I1ω12+I2ω22)=−I1I2(ω1−ω2)2(I_1\omega_1+I_2\omega_2)^2 - (I_1+I_2)(I_1\omega_1^2+I_2\omega_2^2) = -I_1I_2(\omega_1-\omega_2)^2
A=−I1I22(I1+I2)(ω1−ω2)2A = -\dfrac{I_1I_2}{2(I_1+I_2)}(\omega_1-\omega_2)^2
(4)
Check

The work is negative for every choice of the data except ω1=ω2\omega_1=\omega_2, where it vanishes, and that is the case in which the faces never slide at all and friction has nothing to rub against. Let the lower disc be enormously massive, I2≫I1I_2\gg I_1: then (a) gives ω→ω2\omega\to\omega_2, the heavy disc is unaffected, and (b) gives A→−12I1(ω1−ω2)2A\to-\frac{1}{2}I_1(\omega_1-\omega_2)^2, exactly the kinetic energy the light disc had in the frame turning with the heavy one, all of it destroyed. Dimensionally Iω2I\omega^2 is an energy and the combination I1I2/(I1+I2)I_1I_2/(I_1+I_2) carries the units of a single II.

Remark

Write Ired=I1I2/(I1+I2)I_{\mathrm{red}} = I_1I_2/(I_1+I_2) and the loss is −12Ired(Δω)2-\frac{1}{2}I_{\mathrm{red}}(\Delta\omega)^2, the rotational twin of the energy lost in a perfectly inelastic head-on collision, −12[m1m2/(m1+m2)](Δv)2-\frac{1}{2}\left[m_1m_2/(m_1+m_2)\right](\Delta v)^2. The correspondence is exact term by term, mass going to moment of inertia and velocity to angular velocity, because both problems are the same two-line argument: one conserved additive quantity, one final common rate. The loss depends only on the relative angular velocity, never on how rough the faces were or how long they took to lock, since roughness fixes the duration of the slipping but not its outcome.