Skip to content

Where the One Third Comes From

Irodov 1.238DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 1 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.238

Find the moment of inertia of each of the following uniform bodies:

  1. a thin rod of mass mm and length ll, about an axis perpendicular to the rod and passing through one of its ends;

  2. a thin rectangular plate of mass mm with sides aa and bb, about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the plate and passing through one of its vertices.

Part (a). The rod of mass m and length l, with the axis of rotation through its end O drawn as the gray dashed line perpendicular to it.

Part (a). The rod of mass mm and length ll, with the axis of rotation through its end OO drawn as the gray dashed line perpendicular to it.

Given
  • (a) mm, ll
  • (b) mm, aa, bb
  • both bodies uniform
Find
(a) II about a perpendicular axis through an end, (b) II about a perpendicular axis through a vertex

Solution

Step 1The rod, sliced along its length

The moment of inertia is the sum of r2 dmr^2\,dm over the body, so the only work is to say what dmdm is and how far it sits from the axis. A uniform rod carries mass in proportion to length, so a slice of length dxdx holds the fraction dx/ldx/l of the total, and every point of that slice is the same distance xx from the axis at the end.

The shaded slice is the element: a piece of length dx whose distance from the axis through O is x.

The shaded slice is the element: a piece of length dxdx whose distance from the axis through OO is xx.

dm=ml dxdm = \frac{m}{l}\,dx
dI=x2 dm=ml x2 dxdI = x^2\,dm = \frac{m}{l}\,x^2\,dx
(1)
Step 2Add the slices from one end to the other

Summing means integrating xx across the whole rod, from the end that carries the axis to the far end.

I=∫0lml x2 dx=ml[x33]0l=ml⋅l33\begin{align*}I &= \int_0^l \frac{m}{l}\,x^2\,dx \\ &= \frac{m}{l}\left[\frac{x^3}{3}\right]_0^l \\ &= \frac{m}{l}\cdot\frac{l^3}{3}\end{align*}
Irod=13 ml2I_{\mathrm{rod}} = \frac{1}{3}\,m l^2
(2)
Step 3The plate, cut into little rectangles

Now the mass is spread over an area, so the element is a small rectangle dxdx by dydy, and it holds the fraction dx dy/(ab)dx\,dy/(ab) of the plate. The new feature is the distance: the axis is perpendicular to the plate at the vertex, so what enters is the distance from the vertex within the plane, and that is the hypotenuse of the two coordinates.

Part (b). The plate, with the rotation axis out of the page through the vertex O, marked by the circled dot. The shaded element has sides dx and dy, at coordinates x and y, a distance r from the axis.

Part (b). The plate, with the rotation axis out of the page through the vertex OO, marked by the circled dot. The shaded element has sides dxdx and dydy, at coordinates xx and yy, a distance rr from the axis.

dm=mab dx dy,r2=x2+y2dm = \frac{m}{ab}\,dx\,dy , \qquad r^2 = x^2 + y^2
dI=(x2+y2) mab dx dydI = (x^2+y^2)\,\frac{m}{ab}\,dx\,dy
(3)
Step 4Integrate over the whole rectangle

The element must sweep the whole plate, so yy runs across the side bb for each fixed xx, and then xx runs along the side aa. Doing the inner integral first leaves an ordinary integral in xx.

I=mab∫0a ⁣ ⁣∫0b(x2+y2) dy dx=mab∫0a[x2y+y33]0bdx=mab∫0a(x2b+b33)dx=mab[bx33+b3x3]0a=mab(a3b3+ab33)\begin{align*}I &= \frac{m}{ab}\int_0^a\!\!\int_0^b (x^2+y^2)\,dy\,dx \\ &= \frac{m}{ab}\int_0^a\left[x^2 y + \frac{y^3}{3}\right]_0^b dx \\ &= \frac{m}{ab}\int_0^a\left(x^2 b + \frac{b^3}{3}\right) dx \\ &= \frac{m}{ab}\left[\frac{b x^3}{3} + \frac{b^3 x}{3}\right]_0^a \\ &= \frac{m}{ab}\left(\frac{a^3 b}{3} + \frac{a b^3}{3}\right)\end{align*}
Iplate=13 m(a2+b2)I_{\mathrm{plate}} = \frac{1}{3}\,m\left(a^2+b^2\right)
(4)
Check

The rod result can be tested against the same integral taken about the center, where the limits run from −l/2-l/2 to l/2l/2 and give ml2/12ml^2/12; adding m(l/2)2m(l/2)^2 for the shift of the axis out to the end, as the parallel axis theorem requires, returns ml2/12+ml2/4=ml2/3ml^2/12 + ml^2/4 = ml^2/3, the boxed value. The plate result passes two tests. Squashing it, b→0b\to0, leaves ma2/3ma^2/3, which is the rod of part (a) as it must be. And its two terms are separately the moments of the plate about the two edges through the vertex, mb2/3mb^2/3 and ma2/3ma^2/3, each of which is the part (a) integral again with the other coordinate merely along for the ride, so the answer is their sum exactly as the perpendicular axis theorem says.

Remark

The factor 1/31/3 is not a property of rods or of plates but of the integral ∫0Lx2 dx=L3/3\int_0^L x^2\,dx = L^3/3 against a mass proportional to LL: uniform mass measured from one end always has mean square distance L2/3L^2/3, and measured from the center it is L2/12L^2/12, four times smaller, which is the whole difference between the two standard rod formulas. There is also a small surprise in the plate. Since a2+b2a^2+b^2 is the square of the diagonal drawn from the vertex, the plate about its corner has exactly the moment of inertia of a rod of that diagonal’s length about its end, of the same mass. The two bodies have nothing else in common; the coincidence is that both integrals are governed by the same mean square distance from the axis.