Skip to content

Earth's Spin Splits Satellite Kinetic Energy

Irodov 1.226DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 3 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.226

A satellite skims the Earth’s surface in a circular orbit lying in the equatorial plane, radius essentially equal to the Earth’s radius RR. Two senses of travel are possible: with the Earth’s own rotation, or against it. Working in a reference frame fixed to, and rotating with, the Earth, find the ratio of the satellite’s kinetic energy when it travels against the Earth’s rotation to its kinetic energy when it travels with the Earth’s rotation.

The satellite m on a ring of radius R about the spinning Earth. v_1 is its velocity traveling with the Earth's own spin Ω, v_2 the same orbit run the other way.

The satellite mm on a ring of radius RR about the spinning Earth. v1\vect v_1 is its velocity traveling with the Earth’s own spin Ω\vect\Omega, v2\vect v_2 the same orbit run the other way.

Given
  • circular equatorial orbit at r≈Rr\approx R
  • two senses: with or against the Earth’s rotation Ω\vect\Omega
Find
the ratio Kagainst/KwithK_{\text{against}}/K_{\text{with}} of the kinetic energies measured in the Earth-fixed frame

Solution

Step 1Orbital speed and the Earth’s own rotation rate

Gravity supplies the centripetal force for the circular orbit at radius RR, where MM is the Earth’s mass; the Earth itself turns uniformly at rate Ω\Omega about its axis, carrying a surface point at the equator along at speed uu.

γMmR2=mv2R  ⟹  v=γMR=gR,u=ΩR=2πRT.(1) \frac{\gamma M m}{R^2} = \frac{mv^2}{R} \;\Longrightarrow\; v=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma M}{R}}=\sqrt{gR}, \qquad u = \Omega R = \frac{2\pi R}{T}. \tag{1}
Step 2Speed relative to the ground, in each sense

A point of the Earth-fixed frame at the satellite’s radius moves eastward at uu. Traveling with the rotation, the satellite’s own velocity is in that same sense, so the two speeds subtract; traveling against it, the velocities are opposite, so the two speeds add.

vwith=v−u,vagainst=v+u.\begin{align*} v_{\text{with}} &= v - u, \\ v_{\text{against}} &= v + u. \tag{2}\end{align*}
Step 3The kinetic energy ratio

The satellite’s mass is the same in both cases, so it cancels from the ratio of the two kinetic energies, leaving only the ratio of the relative speeds squared.

KagainstKwith=12mvagainst212mvwith2=(v+uv−u)2.\frac{K_{\text{against}}}{K_{\text{with}}} = \frac{\dfrac12 m v_{\text{against}}^2}{\dfrac12 m v_{\text{with}}^2} = \left(\frac{v+u}{v-u}\right)^2.
Step 4Evaluate

Using g=9.8 m/s2g=9.8\ \mathrm{m/s^2}, R=6.37×106R=6.37\times10^6 m, and the Earth’s sidereal rotation period T=8.6164×104T=8.6164\times10^4 s (the period relevant here, since uu is the ground’s speed in the same inertial frame the orbit itself is analyzed in), (1) gives

v=gR=7.901 km/s,u=2πRT=0.4645 km/s.v = \sqrt{gR} = 7.901\ \mathrm{km/s}, \qquad u = \frac{2\pi R}{T} = 0.4645\ \mathrm{km/s}.

Substituting into the boxed ratio,

KagainstKwith=(7.901+0.46457.901−0.4645)2=(8.3667.436)2.\frac{K_{\text{against}}}{K_{\text{with}}} = \left(\frac{7.901+0.4645}{7.901-0.4645}\right)^2 = \left(\frac{8.366}{7.436}\right)^2.
KagainstKwith=(v+uv−u)2≈1.27\frac{K_{\text{against}}}{K_{\text{with}}} = \left(\frac{v+u}{v-u}\right)^2 \approx 1.27
(3)
Check

With x=u/v≈0.0588x=u/v\approx0.0588, expanding (1+x)2/(1−x)2≈1+4x+8x2(1+x)^2/(1-x)^2\approx1+4x+8x^2 gives 1+4x≈1.2351+4x\approx1.235 and, adding the next term 8x2≈0.0288x^2\approx0.028 (about 2.2%2.2\% of the total), ≈1.263\approx1.263, close to the exact 1.2651.265 to within the still-neglected O(x3)O(x^3) terms, confirming the algebra. Setting u=0u=0 (a non-rotating Earth) collapses the boxed ratio to exactly 11, as it must: with no preferred spin direction the two senses would be identical.

Remark

The satellite’s kinetic energy in the inertial frame, mv2/2mv^2/2, is exactly the same for both senses of travel, since both are circular orbits of the same radius and hence the same speed vv. The whole 1.271.27-fold difference this problem asks for is therefore not a difference in the satellite’s actual orbital energy at all: it is purely a statement about which frame is doing the measuring, the Earth-fixed frame subtracting a different ground speed depending on which way the satellite passes overhead.