Skip to content

Angular Momentum Seen from a Sliding Frame

Irodov 1.189DifficultyDifficulty 3 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.189

A ball of mass mm is released from rest and falls a height hh under gravity, air drag neglected. A second reference frame carries a fixed point OO that translates horizontally at constant velocity V\vect V; the ball is released exactly from OO’s instantaneous position at the moment of release. Find the magnitude of the change in the ball’s angular momentum, measured relative to the moving point OO and using the ball’s velocity relative to that frame, accumulated over the whole time it takes the ball to fall the height hh.

At time t the ball has fallen 12 gt^2 while the frame's point O has moved a horizontal distance Vt from the common release point. The vector r ' joins O to the ball: its position relative to the moving frame.

At time tt the ball has fallen 12gt2\frac12 gt^2 while the frame’s point OO has moved a horizontal distance VtVt from the common release point. The vector r ′\vect r\,' joins OO to the ball: its position relative to the moving frame.

Given
  • mm
  • hh
  • V\vect V
  • gg
Find
∣ΔMO∣|\Delta\vect M_O| over the fall

Solution

Step 1Position and velocity relative to the moving frame

In the ground frame the ball falls from rest, so at time tt its velocity is gtgt downward and its displacement is gt2/2gt^2/2 downward, while OO has moved a horizontal distance VtVt from the common start. Subtracting the frame’s own uniform translation gives the ball’s position and velocity relative to OO,

r ′(t)=−Vt i+12gt2 jv ′(t)=−V i+gt j,\begin{align*}\vect r\,'(t) &= -Vt\,\vect i + \frac{1}{2}gt^2\,\vect j \\ \vect v\,'(t) &= -V\,\vect i + gt\,\vect j,\end{align*}

with i\vect i horizontal (the direction of V\vect V) and j\vect j vertically down.

Step 2Angular momentum relative to OO as a function of time

The angular momentum relative to OO, using the relative position and the relative velocity, is MO(t)=m r ′(t)×v ′(t)\vect M_O(t) = m\,\vect r\,'(t)\times\vect v\,'(t).

Only the mixed terms remain, and both of them lie along i×j=k\vect i\times\vect j=\vect k,

MO(t)=m(−Vt i+12gt2 j)×(−V i+gt j)=m[−Vt⋅gt (i×j)+12gt2⋅(−V) (j×i)]=m[−Vgt2+12Vgt2]k\begin{align*}\vect M_O(t) &= m\left(-Vt\,\vect i+\frac{1}{2}gt^2\,\vect j\right)\times\left(-V\,\vect i+gt\,\vect j\right) \\ &= m\left[-Vt\cdot gt\,(\vect i\times\vect j) + \frac{1}{2}gt^2\cdot(-V)\,(\vect j\times\vect i)\right] \\ &= m\left[-Vgt^2 + \frac{1}{2}Vgt^2\right]\vect k\end{align*}
MO(t)=−12mVgt2 k\vect M_O(t) = -\frac{1}{2}mVgt^2\,\vect k
(1)

Since MO(0)=0\vect M_O(0)=\vect 0 (the ball starts exactly at OO), this expression is itself the increment picked up by time tt.

Step 3Evaluate at the landing time

The fall from rest through height hh takes tf=2h/gt_f=\sqrt{2h/g}, found from h=gtf2/2h=gt_f^2/2.

tf2=2hgt_f^2 = \frac{2h}{g}

Substituting into (1) and taking the magnitude,

∣MO(tf)∣=12mVg tf2=12mVg⋅2hg\begin{align*}|\vect M_O(t_f)| &= \frac{1}{2}mVg\,t_f^2 \\ &= \frac{1}{2}mVg\cdot\frac{2h}{g}\end{align*}
∣ΔMO∣=mVh|\Delta\vect M_O| = mVh
(2)
Check

Dimensionally [m][V][h]=kg⋅(m/s)⋅m=kg m2/s[m][V][h] = \text{kg}\cdot(\text{m/s})\cdot\text{m} = \text{kg}\,\text{m}^2/\text{s}, an angular momentum, as required. Also, if V=0V=0 the moving frame coincides with the ground frame and the ball falls straight through OO with r ′∥v ′\vect r\,'\parallel\vect v\,' at every instant, giving MO≡0\vect M_O\equiv\vect 0; the boxed result correctly vanishes at V=0V=0.

Remark

The formula (1) for MO(t)\vect M_O(t) shows the angular momentum growing quadratically with time along the way, at a rate set entirely by how far the frame has drifted while gravity does the same free fall it always does; only at the specific instant of landing does it collapse to the clean form mVhmVh. The one-half coefficient comes from a partial cancellation inside the cross product: pairing the horizontal leg of r ′\vect r\,' with the vertical leg of v ′\vect v\,' contributes −mVgt2 k-mVgt^2\,\vect k, while pairing the vertical leg of r ′\vect r\,' with the horizontal leg of v ′\vect v\,' contributes +mVgt2/2 k+mVgt^2/2\,\vect k in the opposite sense; adding the two leaves the net −mVgt2/2 k-mVgt^2/2\,\vect k of (1).