Skip to content

Problem Irodov 1.169

A particle of mass m1m_1, moving with speed v0v_0, undergoes a perfectly elastic collision with a stationary particle of mass m2m_2. Determine the mass ratio m1/m2m_1/m_2 in each of two separate cases: (a) the collision is head-on and, afterward, the two particles move in opposite directions with equal speeds; (b) the two particles fly apart symmetrically about the original direction of particle 1’s motion, the angle between their two paths being θ=60∘\theta=60^\circ.

Case (a): a head-on elastic collision. Before, particle 1 approaches particle 2 at rest; after, they move apart along the same line in opposite directions with equal speeds.

Case (a): a head-on elastic collision. Before, particle 1 approaches particle 2 at rest; after, they move apart along the same line in opposite directions with equal speeds.

Given
  • m1m_1, m2m_2, elastic collision, particle 2 initially at rest
  • (a) head-on, equal and opposite outgoing speeds
  • (b) symmetric divergence, θ=60∘\theta=60^\circ
Find
(a) m1/m2m_1/m_2, (b) m1/m2m_1/m_2

Solution

Step 1Case (a): head-on elastic collision formulas

With v0v_0 the incoming speed of particle 1 and v1′v_1', v2′v_2' the signed outgoing velocities along the same line, momentum and kinetic energy are both conserved.

m1v0=m1v1′+m2v2′m1v02=m1v1′2+m2v2′2\begin{align*}m_1v_0 &= m_1v_1'+m_2v_2' \\ m_1v_0^2 &= m_1v_1'^2+m_2v_2'^2\end{align*}

Moving the m1m_1 terms across in each line and factoring the difference of squares in the second,

m1(v0−v1′)=m2v2′m1(v0−v1′)(v0+v1′)=m2v2′2\begin{align*}m_1(v_0-v_1') &= m_2v_2' \\ m_1(v_0-v_1')(v_0+v_1') &= m_2v_2'^2\end{align*}

Dividing the second line by the first (legitimate as long as a collision actually occurs, so that v2′≠0v_2'\neq0) cancels the shared factor.

v0+v1′=v2′v_0+v_1' = v_2'

Substituting that back into the momentum equation and collecting the v1′v_1' terms,

m1v0=m1v1′+m2(v0+v1′)m1v0−m2v0=m1v1′+m2v1′v0(m1−m2)=v1′(m1+m2)\begin{align*}m_1v_0 &= m_1v_1'+m_2(v_0+v_1') \\ m_1v_0-m_2v_0 &= m_1v_1'+m_2v_1' \\ v_0(m_1-m_2) &= v_1'(m_1+m_2)\end{align*}
v1′=m1−m2m1+m2 v0v_1' = \dfrac{m_1-m_2}{m_1+m_2}\,v_0
(1)

The relation v2′=v0+v1′v_2'=v_0+v_1' then gives the target’s outgoing velocity.

v2′=v0+m1−m2m1+m2v0=(m1+m2)+(m1−m2)m1+m2v0\begin{align*}v_2' &= v_0+\frac{m_1-m_2}{m_1+m_2}v_0 \\ &= \frac{(m_1+m_2)+(m_1-m_2)}{m_1+m_2}v_0\end{align*}
v2′=2m1m1+m2 v0v_2' = \dfrac{2m_1}{m_1+m_2}\,v_0
(2)
Step 2Impose equal and opposite outgoing speeds

The two particles fly apart in opposite directions with equal speeds, so v1′=−v2′v_1'=-v_2'. Substituting (1) and (2),

m1−m2m1+m2v0=−2m1m1+m2v0\frac{m_1-m_2}{m_1+m_2}v_0 = -\frac{2m_1}{m_1+m_2}v_0

Since v0≠0v_0\neq0 and m1+m2≠0m_1+m_2\neq0, both may be canceled, and the masses collect on one side.

m1−m2=−2m13m1=m2\begin{align*}m_1-m_2 &= -2m_1 \\ 3m_1 &= m_2\end{align*}
m1m2=13\dfrac{m_1}{m_2} = \dfrac{1}{3}
(3)
Step 3Case (b): symmetric divergence at angle θ\theta
Case (b): before, particle 1 approaches particle 2 at rest; after, particle 2 recoils to the side its center lies on and particle 1 continues on the other side, with the shorter arrow. The divergence angle appears in the next figure.

Case (b): before, particle 1 approaches particle 2 at rest; after, particle 2 recoils to the side its center lies on and particle 1 continues on the other side, with the shorter arrow. The divergence angle appears in the next figure.

The two outgoing directions on their own, taken from the collision point: particle 2 leaves at θ/2 above particle 1's original line of motion (dashed) and particle 1 at θ/2 below it, so the angle between the two outgoing paths is θ.

The two outgoing directions on their own, taken from the collision point: particle 2 leaves at θ/2\theta/2 above particle 1’s original line of motion (dashed) and particle 1 at θ/2\theta/2 below it, so the angle between the two outgoing paths is θ\theta.

Momentum conservation, resolved along the original direction and transverse to it,

m1v0=m1v1cos⁡(θ/2)+m2v2cos⁡(θ/2)0=m1v1sin⁡(θ/2)−m2v2sin⁡(θ/2).\begin{align*}m_1 v_0 &= m_1 v_1\cos(\theta/2)+m_2 v_2\cos(\theta/2) \\ 0 &= m_1 v_1\sin(\theta/2)-m_2 v_2\sin(\theta/2).\end{align*}

The transverse equation says the two transverse components cancel, so the two outgoing momenta have the same magnitude; name that common magnitude pp.

p=m1v1=m2v2p = m_1v_1 = m_2v_2
(4)

Substituting (4) into the along-axis equation, whose two terms then become equal,

m1v0=2pcos⁡(θ/2)m_1 v_0 = 2p\cos(\theta/2)

and solving for pp,

p=m1v02cos⁡(θ/2)p = \dfrac{m_1 v_0}{2\cos(\theta/2)}
(5)
Step 4Close with energy conservation

Kinetic energy conservation, written with v1=p/m1v_1=p/m_1 and v2=p/m2v_2=p/m_2 from (4),

12m1v02=12p2m1+12p2m2m1v02=p2(1m1+1m2).\begin{align*}\frac{1}{2}m_1v_0^2 &= \frac{1}{2}\frac{p^2}{m_1}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{p^2}{m_2} \\ m_1v_0^2 &= p^2\left(\frac{1}{m_1}+\frac{1}{m_2}\right).\end{align*}

Substituting (5) and simplifying,

m1v02=m12v024cos⁡2(θ/2)⋅m1+m2m1m21=m1+m24m2cos⁡2(θ/2)4m2cos⁡2(θ/2)=m1+m2.\begin{align*}m_1v_0^2 &= \frac{m_1^2v_0^2}{4\cos^2(\theta/2)}\cdot\frac{m_1+m_2}{m_1m_2} \\ 1 &= \frac{m_1+m_2}{4m_2\cos^2(\theta/2)} \\ 4m_2\cos^2(\theta/2) &= m_1+m_2.\end{align*}

Solving for the mass ratio,

m1m2=4cos⁡2(θ/2)−1.\frac{m_1}{m_2} = 4\cos^2(\theta/2)-1.

Using 4cos⁡2(θ/2)−2=2cos⁡θ4\cos^2(\theta/2)-2=2\cos\theta and evaluating at θ=60∘\theta=60^\circ,

m1m2=1+2cos⁡θ=2.0\dfrac{m_1}{m_2} = 1+2\cos\theta = 2.0
(6)
Check

In case (a), m1/m2=1/3<1m_1/m_2=1/3<1 correctly makes particle 1 the lighter body, the only way a target can send the incoming particle straight back ((1) is negative exactly when m1<m2m_1<m_2). In case (b), the limit θ→0\theta\to0 gives m1/m2=1+2cos⁡0∘=3m_1/m_2=1+2\cos0^\circ=3, the largest ratio the symmetric formula allows, since θ→0\theta\to0 is as close as the symmetric geometry can come to a head-on hit without leaving it. The other end of the range is not a second head-on limit but a singularity: (5) blows up as θ→180∘\theta\to180^\circ (where cos⁡(θ/2)→0\cos(\theta/2)\to0), so the symmetric formula is valid only on the open range 0<θ<180∘0<\theta<180^\circ and never actually reaches case (a)’s separate, genuinely head-on geometry.

Remark

Case (b)’s figure shows particle 2 recoiling faster than particle 1 continues (v2′>v1′v_2'>v_1', since m1>m2m_1>m_2 here), and (4) shows why: the transverse-momentum equation alone forces the two outgoing momenta to be equal in magnitude for any symmetric divergence, so whichever particle is lighter must carry the larger speed to keep the two momenta equal in magnitude, a purely geometric consequence of the equal-and-opposite transverse components. This is independent of case (a), where the two outgoing speeds are equal by hypothesis instead, so the momenta there scale with the masses directly rather than inversely.