Problem Irodov 1.165
A stone is released from rest at height above the ground and falls freely under a constant gravitational acceleration , air resistance neglected, striking the ground with speed relative to the Earth. Demonstrate that this same relation for is recovered when the fall is analyzed instead in a reference frame that itself moves downward, relative to the Earth, at the constant velocity .
The setup in the Earth frame : the stone is released from rest a height above the ground and falls freely from there.
- Given
- K moves at constant velocity relative to the Earth
- Find
- demonstrate that the same relation follows when the fall is analyzed in
Solution
Step 1Transform the stone’s and the ground’s velocities into
Take the downward direction as positive, with the stone released at from and the ground at . In the stone’s velocity is , and the ground, fixed in , has velocity . Since moves at the constant velocity (downward) relative to , subtracting from each gives the same quantities in :
Step 2The stone and the ground start at relative rest in
The release instant in the two frames. In the stone is at rest a height above the ground. In , falling at , both the stone and the ground move upward at that one speed, so the two start at relative rest.
Evaluating the stone’s velocity (1) at the release instant ,
which is exactly the ground’s velocity found above. So at the relative velocity of the stone with respect to the ground in is
even though neither body is individually at rest in : both instantaneously share the single velocity (a speed upward), which is exactly what the figure’s right-hand panel shows.
Step 3Integrate the relative motion in
Differentiating and from (1), the stone’s velocity relative to the ground in is
which vanishes at , consistent with (2). Integrating this relative velocity from release to the contact instant gives the relative displacement covered by then,
A Galilean transform translates both bodies’ positions by the same amount at any instant, so the separation between the stone and the ground at is still in , exactly as in ; the relative displacement above must therefore equal ,
Substituting back into at gives the relative speed at contact.
because the relative speed of approach between the stone and the ground is exactly the quantity the problem calls , and it cannot depend on which inertial frame it was computed in.
Check
A striking by-product confirms the bookkeeping: evaluating from (1) at the contact instant gives , so the stone arrives at the ground with zero velocity of its own in . That is consistent, not contradictory: the ground itself is still moving upward at in at that instant, so the relative velocity is , matching (2)’s zero at the start and the boxed result at the end.
Remark
The formula was never really a statement about the stone’s velocity in one particular frame; it is a statement about the relative velocity of approach between the stone and the Earth, and relative velocity is Galilean invariant, so the stone and the ground share a common velocity at the release instant in every inertial frame, included (both simply start at rest there). What is special about is the other end of the motion: by the checkline above, is the unique inertial frame in which the stone’s own velocity happens to vanish exactly at the moment of impact, which is why, viewed from inside , the whole event reads as a fresh drop from rest, even though neither body is at rest in an absolute sense.
