Skip to content

Reflect the Trajectory Through the Center

Irodov 1.144DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 4 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.144

Two particles of masses m1m_1 and m2=m1/2m_2=m_1/2 interact with each other and with nothing else, so their common center of inertia stays at one fixed point for all time. At a certain moment the positions of both particles are known, and the complete path (past and future) that the particle of mass m1m_1 traces is also known, a curved line through that particle’s marked position. Using only the fixed center of inertia and the mass ratio, construct the trajectory traced by the particle of mass m2m_2.

What the problem supplies: the given trajectory of m_1 and the marked positions of both particles at one instant.

What the problem supplies: the given trajectory of m1m_1 and the marked positions of both particles at one instant.

Given
  • m2=m1/2m_2=m_1/2
  • the trajectory of m1m_1
  • both particles’ positions at one instant
Find
the trajectory of m2m_2

Solution

Step 1The center of inertia is a fixed point
The center of inertia C located from the one pictured instant: it divides the segment joining the two marked positions (dashed) in the ratio m_2:m_1 = 1:2, so it sits twice as far from m_2's position as from m_1's.

The center of inertia CC located from the one pictured instant: it divides the segment joining the two marked positions (dashed) in the ratio m2:m1=1:2m_2:m_1 = 1:2, so it sits twice as far from m2m_2’s position as from m1m_1’s.

The system is closed (no external forces), so its total momentum is conserved; it is given to be zero.

m1v1+m2v2=0m_1\vect v_1+m_2\vect v_2 = \vect 0
(1)

Each velocity is the time derivative of its particle’s position vector, so (1) is a statement about the rate of change of one combination of the two positions.

m1dr1dt+m2dr2dt=0ddt(m1r1+m2r2)=0\begin{align*}m_1\frac{d\vect r_1}{dt}+m_2\frac{d\vect r_2}{dt} &= \vect 0 \\ \frac{d}{dt}\bigl(m_1\vect r_1+m_2\vect r_2\bigr) &= \vect 0\end{align*}

Integrating over time from 00 to tt, the combination keeps its initial value, a constant vector; writing that constant as (m1+m2)rC(m_1+m_2)\vect r_C names the point it defines.

∫0tddt′(m1r1+m2r2) dt′=0m1r1(t)+m2r2(t)=m1r1(0)+m2r2(0)\begin{align*}\int_0^t\frac{d}{dt'}\bigl(m_1\vect r_1+m_2\vect r_2\bigr)\,dt' &= \vect 0 \\ m_1\vect r_1(t)+m_2\vect r_2(t) &= m_1\vect r_1(0)+m_2\vect r_2(0)\end{align*}
m1r1(t)+m2r2(t)=(m1+m2) rCm_1\vect r_1(t)+m_2\vect r_2(t) = (m_1+m_2)\,\vect r_C
(2)

Being constant, rC\vect r_C names the same point CC for every tt, including the pictured instant, so CC can be located directly from the one instant shown.

rC=m1r1+m2r2m1+m2\vect r_C = \frac{m_1\vect r_1+m_2\vect r_2}{m_1+m_2}
Step 2Solve for m2m_2’s position at every instant

Isolating m2r2(t)m_2\vect r_2(t) in (2), dividing by m2m_2, and splitting (m1+m2)/m2(m_1+m_2)/m_2 as 1+m1/m21+m_1/m_2 gives m2m_2’s position at every instant directly from m1m_1’s, at that same instant; inserting m2=m1/2m_2=m_1/2 (so m1/m2=2m_1/m_2=2) finishes it.

m2r2(t)=(m1+m2)rC−m1r1(t)r2(t)=rC+m1m2(rC−r1(t))=rC−2(r1(t)−rC)\begin{align*}m_2\vect r_2(t) &= (m_1+m_2)\vect r_C-m_1\vect r_1(t)\\ \vect r_2(t) &= \vect r_C+\frac{m_1}{m_2}\bigl(\vect r_C-\vect r_1(t)\bigr)\\ &= \vect r_C - 2\bigl(\vect r_1(t)-\vect r_C\bigr)\end{align*}
r2(t)=3rC−2 r1(t)\vect r_2(t) = 3\vect r_C - 2\,\vect r_1(t)
(3)
Step 3Read the construction off the formula
The constructed trajectory of m_2 (blue): the image of m_1's given curve (black) under the point reflection through C with scale factor m_1/m_2=2, so twice as large and on the opposite side of C at every instant.

The constructed trajectory of m2m_2 (blue): the image of m1m_1’s given curve (black) under the point reflection through CC with scale factor m1/m2=2m_1/m_2=2, so twice as large and on the opposite side of CC at every instant.

For every point PP that lies on m1m_1’s given trajectory, the corresponding point on m2m_2’s trajectory is obtained by the same map applied to PP,

Q=rC+m1m2(rC−P)=3rC−2P,Q = \vect r_C + \frac{m_1}{m_2}\bigl(\vect r_C-P\bigr) = 3\vect r_C-2P,

so m2m_2’s whole path is the point-reflection of m1m_1’s path through CC, magnified by the factor m1/m2=2m_1/m_2=2. That is the blue curve in the figure.

Check

Applied to m1m_1’s own pictured position, the map returns exactly m2m_2’s pictured position (both are on the same line through CC, on opposite sides, with CC twice as far from m2m_2’s marked position as from m1m_1’s, consistent with m1=2m2m_1=2m_2), which is the one point where the construction can be checked directly against the given data. The mass-weighted sum also closes: m1r1+m2r2=m1r1+(m1/2)(3rC−2r1)=(3m1/2)rC=(m1+m2)rCm_1\vect r_1+m_2\vect r_2=m_1\vect r_1+ (m_1/2)\bigl(3\vect r_C-2\vect r_1\bigr) = (3m_1/2)\vect r_C = (m_1+m_2)\vect r_C, matching (2).

Remark

Nothing about the shape of m1m_1’s path mattered, only that it is a path through points that are each paired, instant by instant, with a point on m2m_2’s path by the same fixed linear map. The same construction works for any closed two-body system with its center of inertia at rest, however complicated the interaction force: Kepler’s ellipse for one body and its partner’s ellipse under gravity are related by exactly this point reflection and scaling.