Skip to content

Centrifugal Work Only Reads the Radius

Irodov 1.128DifficultyDifficulty 2 of 5UniquenessUniqueness 2 of 5

Problem Irodov 1.128

In a reference frame rotating about a fixed axis with constant angular velocity ω\omega, a small body of mass mm moves from a point 11 to a point 22 along some arbitrary path in that frame, where point 1 is a distance r1r_1 from the rotation axis and point 2 is a distance r2r_2 from it. Find the work done by the centrifugal force of inertia during this transfer, given m=0.10m=0.10 kg, ω=5.0\omega=5.0 rad/s, r1=30r_1=30 cm and r2=50r_2=50 cm.

A path in the rotating frame from point 1 (radius r_1) to point 2 (radius r_2), about the axis O turning at ω. The outward centrifugal force is drawn at each end; the path dips inside r_1 at P.

A path in the rotating frame from point 11 (radius r1r_1) to point 22 (radius r2r_2), about the axis OO turning at ω\omega. The outward centrifugal force is drawn at each end; the path dips inside r1r_1 at PP.

Given
  • mm
  • ω\omega
  • r1r_1
  • r2r_2
Find
AcfA_{cf}, the work done by the centrifugal force from point 1 to point 2

Solution

Step 1The centrifugal force as a function of radius

In the rotating frame, the centrifugal force of inertia on the body at distance rr from the rotation axis points radially outward from that axis with magnitude proportional to rr.

Fcf(r)=mω2r r^\vect F_{cf}(r) = m\omega^2 r\,\hat{\vect r}
(1)
Step 2Work as a path integral, reduced to a radial one

The work done as the body moves along an element drd\vect r of an arbitrary path is Fcf⋅dr\vect F_{cf}\cdot d\vect r using (1); since Fcf\vect F_{cf} is always directed along r^\hat{\vect r}, only the radial component of the displacement, drdr, ever contributes, so the line integral collapses to an ordinary integral in rr alone from r1r_1 to r2r_2.

Acf=∫12Fcf⋅dr=∫r1r2mω2r drA_{cf} = \int_1^2 \vect F_{cf}\cdot d\vect r = \int_{r_1}^{r_2} m\omega^2 r\,dr
(2)
Step 3Evaluating the integral

Carrying out the integration in (2) gives the work in terms of the endpoint radii alone.

Acf=mω2r22∣r1r2A_{cf} = \left.\frac{m\omega^2 r^2}{2}\right|_{r_1}^{r_2}
Acf=mω22(r22−r12)=0.20 JA_{cf} = \dfrac{m\omega^2}{2}\bigl(r_2^2-r_1^2\bigr) = 0.20\ \mathrm J
(3)
Check

Dimensionally, [m][ω2][r2]=(kg)(s−2)(m2)=J[m][\omega^2][r^2] = (\mathrm{kg})(\mathrm{s^{-2}})(\mathrm{m^2}) = \mathrm J, as required. Numerically, 0.5×0.10×5.02×(0.502−0.302)=0.5×0.10×25×0.16=0.200.5\times0.10\times5.0^2\times(0.50^2-0.30^2) = 0.5\times0.10\times25\times0.16 = 0.20 J, matching the boxed formula. As r2→r1r_2\to r_1 the work correctly vanishes, whatever path connects two points at the same radius.

Remark

Step 2 is the same argument that makes gravity’s work path independent: a force directed radially outward from a fixed axis (not a point), with magnitude a function of the axial distance rr alone, is still conservative, because its work along any path depends only on how rr changes and never on the displacement along the axis or around it, exactly as for a true central force, with potential U(r)=−∫F(r) drU(r) = -\int F(r)\,dr. Here Ucf(r)=−mω2r2/2U_{cf}(r) = -m\omega^2r^2/2, the familiar centrifugal potential, and Acf=Ucf(r1)−Ucf(r2)A_{cf}=U_{cf}(r_1)-U_{cf}(r_2) reproduces the boxed result without ever integrating along the actual path.